Del i serien Conversations in Medicine and Society

Deadly Dust

Silicosis and the On-Going Struggle to Protect Workers' Health

Häftad, Engelska, 2006

499 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

During the Depression, silicosis, an industrial lung disease, emerged as a national social crisis. Experts estimated that hundreds of thousands of workers were at risk of disease, disability, and death by inhaling silica in mines, foundries, and quarries. By the 1950s, however, silicosis was nearly forgotten by the media and health professionals. Asking what makes a health threat a public issue, David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz examine how a culture defines disease and how disease itself is understood at different moments in history. They also explore the interlocking relationships of public health, labor, business, and government to discuss who should assume responsibility for occupational disease.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2006-06-12
Mått152 x 229 x undefined mm
FormatHäftad
SpråkEngelska
SerieConversations in Medicine and Society
Antal sidor280
FörlagThe University of Michigan Press
ISBN9780472031108

Tillhör följande kategorier

Folkhälsa och hälsopedagogik inom Medicin
Lungmedicin inom Medicin

Rosner and Markowitz have produced a carefully crafted history of the rise and fall of this occupational disease, focusing especially on the political forces behind changing disease definitions.... Deadly Dust comes as a fresh breeze into one of the more stuffy and too often ignored alleys of medical history. - The Journal of the American Medical Association ""A thought-provoking, densely referenced, uncompromising history.... Like all good history, it challenges our basic assumptions about how the world is ordered and offers both factual information and a conceptual framework for rethinking what we 'know.'"" - The New England Journal of Medicine ""If there is a paradigmatic tale of occupational health... Deadly Dust is it."" - Science ""Deadly Dust raises an important methodological problem that has long gone underarticulated in medical historical circles: how can social historians of medicine offer political or economic explanations for the scientific efforts of their professional subjects without losing a grip on the biological aspects of disease?"" - The Journal of the History of Medicine