Culture and Cruelty in Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, and Artaud

Max Statkiewicz is associate professor of comparative literature and folklore studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

• Abbreviations of Nietzsche’s WorksAbbreviations of Dostoevsky’s WorksIntroductionFirst Chapter: Cruelty: Nietzsche’s Genealogy of CultureSecond Chapter: "Feeling of Thought": Nietzsche’s Critique of Terrible Abstractedness and Dostoevsky’s Triumph in the ConcreteThird Chapter: Purification of Cruelty in Antonin ArtaudConclusion

In Culture and Cruelty in Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, Artaud, Max Stakiewicz deals, once again, with the “old quarrel” between poetry and philosophy. In his previous book – Rhapsody of Philosophy. Dialogues with Plato in Contemporary Thought (2009) – Stakiewicz had already called into question the very idea of such a “quarrel” by showing that the dialogue between “rigor” (akribeia) and “play” (paidia) can be read in Plato himself as a non-conflict. By rethinking the relationship between philosophy and poetry in contemporary thought, Rhapsody of Philosophy concludes that poetry and philosophy are not antagonists, but rather complicit knowledge processes. In this new book, Stakiewicz goes back to the so-called “Ode to Man” in Sophocles’ Antigone – human being is the most wonderful and the most terrible thing that there is – to argue that culture and cruelty are not binaries but rather different ways of understanding the complex world we live in. Against Matthew Arnold’s culture as “sweetness and light,” which tends to oversee cruelty, Stakiewicz stresses the disquieting power of art by analyzing the revelation of cruelty in his exemplary study of three poet-philosophers or philosopher-poets: Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, and Artaud. Difference in the culture, Stakiewicz shows us in the work of these three artists, is what resists the dreadful nihilism of indifference in a culture that goes on wrecking violence and destruction all over the world.