Contesting Hydropower in the Brazilian Amazon

Ed Atkins is a Lecturer at the School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, UK, where he conducts interdisciplinary research on the ways in which environmental and energy policy are negotiated. This is with a particular focus on working to ensure a just energy transition.

• 1. Introduction 2. Redesigning Hydrology 3. Damming the Amazon 4. ‘By hook or by crook’ 5. Belo Monstro 6. "A country that cannot live with difference" 7. Refusing to Celebrate Victory 8. Final Remarks Appendix Bibliography Index

"This book takes a new approach to the battle between pro-dam and anti-dam movements, emphasizing storylines and what lies underneath their discourses. It uncovers the motivations of each, and questions the way each uses sustainability arguments to their own purposes."Emilio F. Moran, John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor, Michigan State University"Hydroelectric dams are not made only of concrete. As this engaging book shows, they are also built out of storylines that construct justifications for them that call them sustainable. Atkins uses a deeply-researched study of two Brazilian dam projects to show how heterogenous opposition movements can also wield storylines to repoliticize and resist such projects, and even to challenge the broader claim that hydropower is a sustainable energy choice."Kathryn Hochstetler, Professor of International Development, LSE"Atkins provides us with an update on the longstanding dams debate, focusing specifically on large scale dam construction in the Brazilian Amazon. He does so through a careful interrogation of varied storylines regarding dam construction—whether in terms of hydropower and clean energy in an era of climate change mitigation and sustainability –or the multiple storylines of resistance, and Indigenous rights within the broad social and political context of Brazil. The key contributions of the book are precisely to carefully work through narratives to resist and reframe the Belo Monte and Sao Luiz do Tapajos dams and their likely impacts, highlighting themes of exclusion from decision making, environmental and political impacts, and Indigenous rights and territory. In so doing, the work responds to efforts to depoliticize infrastructures and interventions, instead rendering visible and political such projects and how they intersect with broader contextual considerations."Leila M. Harris, Professor, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability and Institute for Gender, Race, Sexuality and Social Justice, Co-Director, Program on Water Governance, University of British Columbia