C. W. Willink (1929–2009), Ph.D. (1989) in Classics, University of Cambridge, taught for many years at Eton College. His publications include Euripides: Orestes (1986, revised 1989).W. Benjamin Henry, D.Phil. (2001) in Classics, University of Oxford, is an independent scholar. His publications include Pindar’s Nemeans: A Selection (2005), Philodemus: On Death (2009), and many articles on Greek poetry and papyrology.

• ForewordPrefaceAcknowledgementsAbbreviations1. Some Problems of Text and Interpretation in the Bacchae (Summary)2. A Problem in Aeschylus’ Septem (Summary)3. Some Problems of Text and Interpretation in the Hippolytus4. The Prologue of Iphigenia at Aulis5. Prodicus, ‘Meteorosophists’ and the ‘Tantalus’ Paradigm6. Review of M. L. West, Greek Metre (Oxford, 1982)7. Sleep after Labour in Euripides’ Heracles8. Euripides, Medea 1–45, 371–859. The Reunion Duo in Euripides’ Helen10. The Parodos of Euripides’ Helen (164–90)11. The Goddess Єὐλάβεια and Pseudo-Euripides in Euripides’ Phoenissae12. Euripides, Supplices 71–86 and the Chorus of ‘Attendants’13. Review of Conacher, Euripides Alcestis and Craik, Euripides Phoenician Women (Warminster, 1988)14. Notes on the Parodos-Scene in Euripides’ Heraclidae, 73–11715. Euripides, Supplices 42–7016. Review of J. Diggle, The Textual Tradition of Euripides’ Orestes (Oxford, 1991)17. Review of J. R. Porter, Studies in Euripides’ Orestes (Mnemosyne Suppl. 128, 1994)18. Review of W. Stockert, Euripides Hippolytus (Teubner, 1994)19. Sophocles, Electra 137–920. Euripides, Hippolytus 145–5021. Further Critical Notes on Euripides’ Hippolytus22. Euripides, Hippolytus 1122–5 (Again)23. Review of J. Chadwick, Lexicographica Graeca (Oxford, 1996)24. Review of H. Lloyd-Jones and N. G. Wilson, Sophocles: Second Thoughts (Hypomnemata 100, 1997)25. The Opening Speech of Sophocles’ Antigone26. Notes on the Parodos and Other Cantica of Euripides’ Cyclops27. Euripides, Andromache 103–125: Metre and Text28. Again the Orestes Musical Papyrus29. Critical Studies in the Cantica of Sophocles i. Antigone30. Critical Studies in the Cantica of Sophocles ii. Ajax, Trachiniae, Oedipus Tyrannus31. Critical Studies in the Cantica of Sophocles iii. Electra, Philoctetes, Oedipus at Colonus32. The Metre of Stesichorus PMG 15/19233. The Invocations of Epaphus in Aeschylus, Supplices 40–57 and Euripides, Phoenissae 676–8934. Euripides, Medea 131–21335. Euripides, Hecuba 905–2236. Euripides, Ion 763–80337. Euripides, Bacchae 402–3338. Further Critical Notes on Euripides’ Orestes39. Studies in the Cantica of Euripides’ Rhesus40. Aeschylus, Agamemnon 173–85 and 205–1741. Aeschylus, Agamemnon 681–71642. Critical Notes on the Cantica of Euripides’ Heracles43. Review of C. Concilio, M. D’Aiuto, S. Polizio, La Tradizione Metrica della Tragedia Greca (Naples, 2002)44. Hecuba 444–6/455–7, Helen 1465–77, Bacchae 565–7545. Critical Notes on the Cantica of Euripides’ Andromache46. Phaedra and ‘Chorus’ in Euripides’ Hippolytus47. Euripides, Iphigenia in Tauris 392–45548. Sophocles, Antigone 23–5 and the Burial of Eteocles49. The Second Stasimon of Euripides’ Electra50. Euripides, Iphigenia in Tauris 123–3651. Euripides, Hippolytus 732–7552. Sophocles, Antigone 891–928 and 929–4353. Entrances, Exits and Locations in Aeschylus’ Persae54. Aeschylus, Supplices 40–8555. Euripides, Electra 432–86 and Iph. Taur. 827–9956. Further on the Helen Reunion Duo57. Further Notes on Euripides’ Medea58. Critical Notes on the Cantica of Euripides’ AlcestisAddenda and CorrigendaIndex Locorum

"The significance of volumes of collected papers in the Classics covers a broad range: some are indifferent, some are indefensible, some are indispensable. This splendid gathering between two boards of the dense Kleine Schriften of Sir Charles Willink (1929-2009) is very firmly of the last category. The importance of Willink’s researches for scholars of Greek tragedy and/or metre has been immense over recent decades [...] The book with which this formidable volume has most in common is John Jackson’s Marginalia Scaenica (1955), a collection [...] that amply bears witness to what a clear head, hard thought and curiosa felicitas (as much as felix curiositas) in emendation can bring the scholar." - David Butterfield, in: BMCR, 31.5.2012