Coercive and Discursive Compliance Mechanisms in the Management of Natural Resources

A Case Study from the Barents Sea Fisheries

Inbunden, Engelska, 2000

AvGeir Hønneland

1 379 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Häftad

1 389 kr

Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar

The debate in the social sciences on the management of common resources crosses interdisciplinary boundaries. Regulation brings little gain if the established rules are not complied with by the users of the resource. The book discusses how public authorities can influence the users' decision-making in this regard, using a variety of coercive and discursive measures. It thus addresses a topic that has suffered from neglect in both the theoretical and practical debate on natural resource management. The Barents Sea fisheries are used as a case study in the book. The Norwegian Coastguard have produced violation statistics and these are used to investigate the level of compliance in these fisheries. Furthermore, a group of Norwegian and Russian fishermen have been consulted, together with representatives of Norwegian fishermens' associations, by means of personal, in-depth interviews aimed at revealing their attitudes to the regulation, management and enforcement systems.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2000-05-31
Mått170 x 244 x undefined mm
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
SerieEnvironment & Policy
Antal sidor187
FörlagKluwer Academic Publishers
ISBN9780792362432

Tillhör följande kategorier

1 Introduction.- Theoretical context — the debate to be addressed.- Empirical background — the Barents Sea and its fishermen.- Empirical context — the issues to be raised.- Methodology.- the structure of the book.- 2 The Interaction of Research Programmes in Social Science Studies of the Commons.- Lakatos and scientific research programmes.- two traditions in the study of common-pool resources.- A Growing Literature on the Commons?.- Conclusion: scientific growth as interaction between theoretical traditions.- 3 A Model of Compliance in Fisheries — Theoretical Foundations and Practical Application.- Background: the study of compliance.- Sources of compliance.- first-order and management-induced compliance.- two compliance mechanisms: coercive and discursive measures.- Management levels and subsystems of compliance.- an agenda for research.- 4 The Barents sea Fisheries — Resources, Jurisdiction and Management.- The Barents Sea fish resources.- The fishing industries of Northern Norway and Northwestern Russia.- the legal setting.- Norway’s fishery relations with other states.- The Russian-Norwegian fishery management regime.- Norwegian fisheries management.- Russian fisheries management.- 5 Compliance in the Barents Sea — a Preliminary Discussion.- Fishing activity in the Barents Sea.- Violation rates in the Barents Sea fisheries.- Do violation rates reflect actual compliance?.- First-order compliance.- Compliance as a result of coercive measures.- “Indirect coercion” in the Svalbard Zone.- Legitimacy and discursive measures.- An observer’s account of co-operative action in the Svalbard Zone.- Conclusion.- 6 How Fishermen Account for Compliance.- The interview setting.- A positive attitude towards the coast guard.- Legitimate regulations andprocedures.- Partly illegitimate research results.- Strict enforcement.- Self-induced compliance.- Conclusion.- 7 Co-Management and Communities in the Barents sea Fisheries.- Theoretical revisit: co-management and communities.- Co-management in Northwest Russian fisheries.- Co-management in Norwegian fisheries.- The Barents Sea fishing communities.- Co-management and compliance.- Conclusion.- 8 Investigation Revisited.- Methodology revisited: the stories fishermen tell.- Hypotheses revisited: discourse or guns?.- Epistemological Context Revisited: Contributions to the Scientific Debate.- 9 Concluding Remarks.- Co-management beyond “user-group participation”.- Co-management — a system-centric perspective?.- Implications of the methodological and epistemological choices Made.- References.