Classical Theories of Money, Output and Inflation

Challenges the conventional view that monetarism, or the theory of money, is a necessary part of classical economics and shows, in a historical account of monetary controversy, that the framework upon which classical (and Marxian) analysis is based suggests an alternative account of the inflationary process. A corollary of the argument is that the monetarist approach is a logically necessary component of neoclassical analysis and that any attempt to criticise that approach in a fundamental way must involve an explicit rejection of the conceptual structure of neoclassical economics.