Clashing Worldviews in the U.S. Supreme Court

Rehnquist vs. Blackmun

Häftad, Engelska, 2021

Av James Davids, Erik Gustafson, Sherena Arrington, James Davids

629 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar

Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Inbunden

1 799 kr

Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar

Contrasting two Protestant justices who hold distinctively different worldviews, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justice Harry A. Blackmun, this book explores how each came to hold his worldview, how each applied it in Supreme Court rulings, and how it led them to differing outcomes for liberty, equality, and justice. This clash of worldviews between Rehnquist, whose religious and philosophical influences were anchored in the Reformation, and Blackmun, whose Reformation theology was modified by Enlightenment philosophy, provide the context to examine the true nature of justice, liberty, and equality and to consider how such ideals can be maintained in a society with increasingly divergent worldviews.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2021-10-19
Mått154 x 218 x 23 mm
Vikt599 g
FormatHäftad
SpråkEngelska
Antal sidor378
FörlagBloomsbury Publishing Plc
ISBN9781498570619

Tillhör följande kategorier

Grundlagar, konstitution inom Juridik

Chapter 1: Understanding Competing Worldviews in AmericaChapter 2: The Theological Background and Worldview of Justice BlackmunChapter 3: Chief Justice William H: Rehnquist’s Theology, Philosophy, and WorldviewChapter 4: DeShaney in the Shadow of the Fourteenth AmendmentChapter 5: Zobrest: Aid to All Students, or Only Those Attending Public Schools?Chapter 6: Kaiser Aetna and the Conservative vs: Progressive Battle of Property RightsChapter 7: Webster: Can a State Prohibit the Public Funding of Abortion?Chapter 8: Bowers: Is Homosexual Conduct Within the Liberties Protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause?Chapter 9: Two Differing Worldviews and Their Implications for Liberty, Equality, and Justice

Jim Davids, Erik Gustafson, and Sherena Arrington have written an important book about how individual worldviews shape not only Supreme Court justices, but all of us. To their credit, these evangelical Protestants with an ‘impulse toward orthodoxy’ reached out to me, a mainline pastor with an ‘impulse toward progressivism’ to offer an endorsement. As I read their thoughtful analysis of how the jurisprudence of Rehnquist and Blackmun captures the essential divides in the Americans culture wars, I was also reminded that until we do the hard work of understanding and respecting one another, we are lost.