Cambridge Handbook of Digital Evidence in Criminal Investigations

Vanessa Franssen is Professor at the University of Liège where she teaches criminal law, national & comparative criminal procedure, as well as cybercrime. Her research centres on the impact of new technologies on criminal justice, EU & comparative criminal law and procedure, economic criminal law, and punitive administrative law. Stanislaw Tosza is Associate Professor in Compliance and Law Enforcement at the University of Luxembourg, where he teaches and researches comparative and European criminal law, white-collar crime, cybercrime and cyberlaw. He is also the Secretary General of the International Association of Penal Law (AIDP).

• Introduction: gathering electronic evidence and cooperation with service providers in the digital era: a jigsaw puzzle of technological and legal challenges Vanessa FRANSSEN and Stanisław TOSZA; Part I. Collecting Digital Evidence: Transversal Challenges and Solutions: 1. Impact of digital evidence gathering on the criminal justice system – A broader perspective Anže ERBEŽNIK; 2. Unresolved jurisdictional issues in law enforcement access to data Dan SVANTESSON and Anna-Maria OSULA; 3. Effective data protection and direct cooperation on digital evidence Gavin ROBINSON; 4. On encryption technologies and potential solutions for lawful access Cyprien DELPECH DE SAINT GUILHEM; 5. Admissibility of digital evidence Giulia LASAGNI; 6. Exchange of data between national security agencies and law enforcement: challenges for criminal procedure Tatiana TROPINA; 7. From mutual trust to the gordian knot of notifications. The e-Evidence regulation and directive Theodore CHRISTAKIS; 8. Moving in the right direction for transborder access to digital evidence in criminal matters? The council of Europe and the second additional protocol introducing direct cooperation Angela AGUINALDO and Paul DE HERT; Part II. Digital Evidence and the Cooperation of Service Providers in EU Criminal Investigations: 9. Digital evidence in criminal matters: Belgian pride and prejudice Sem CAREEL and Frank VERBRUGGEN; 10. Digital evidence in Estonia Agnes KASPER, Eneli LAURITS and Melita SOGOMONJAN; 11. Digital evidence and the cooperation of service providers in Germany Dominik BRODOWSKI; 12. Accessing digital evidence in criminal matters: an inadequate Irish legal framework T. J. MCINTYRE and Maria Helen MURPHY; 13. Digital evidence and the cooperation of service providers in Luxembourg Katalin LIGETI and Gavin ROBINSON; 14. The gathering of digital evidence and cooperation of service providers in Poland Maciej ROGALSKI; 15. Access to retained data and cooperation of service providers in criminal investigations in Spain Carmen CUADRADO SALINAS and Juan Carlos ORTIZ PRADILLO; 16. Comparative analysis of National Law and Practices: unravelling differences in view of EU-wide solutions Stanisław TOSZA and Vanessa FRANSSEN; Part III. Collecting Digital Evidence and the Role of Service Providers: A Global Perspective: 17. Digital evidence and cooperation of service providers in China Li ZHE and Jin ZHENAN; 18. Cooperation of service providers in criminal investigations in the Russian Federation Maria FILATOVA, Olga KOSTYLEVA and Tatiana ALEKSEEVA; 19. Digital evidence collection in Turkey Seçil BILGIҪ; 20. Obtaining digital evidence under UK Law Elif Mendos KUŞKONMAZ and Ian WALDEN; 21. Digital evidence gathering by US Authorities and Cross-Border cooperation with US-Based service providers Marine CORHAY and Vanessa FRANSSEN; Conclusions: collecting digital evidence: from present challenges to future solutions Vanessa FRANSSEN and Stanisław TOSZA.