Del 286 - Philosophy and Religion

C. S. Lewis’s Christian Apologetics

Pro and Con

Häftad, Engelska, 2015

Av Gregory Bassham

1 969 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar

Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Are C. S. Lewis’s major arguments in defense of Christian belief sound? In C. S. Lewis’s Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, defenders and critics of Lewis’s apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis’s arguments from desire, from reason, from morality, the “trilemma” argument for the divinity of Christ, as well as Lewis’s response to the problem of evil. By means of these lively, in-depth debates, readers will emerge with a deeper understanding and appreciation of today’s most influential Christian apologist.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2015-07-10
Mått155 x 235 x 15 mm
Vikt444 g
FormatHäftad
SpråkEngelska
SeriePhilosophy and Religion
Antal sidor272
FörlagBrill
ISBN9789004301252

Tillhör följande kategorier

Litteraturvetenskap inom Skonlitteratur
Filosofiska discipliner inom Filosofi och religion
Religion: allmänt inom Filosofi och religion
Filosofi inom Filosofi och religion

EDITORIAL FOREWORDKENNETH A. BRYSONPREFACEINTRODUCTION: OXFORD'S BONNY APOLOGISTGREGORY BASSHAMPart One:THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIREONE Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis’s Argument from DesirePETER S. WILLIAMSTWO Con: Quenching the Argument from DesireGREGORY BASSHAMTHREE Reply to Gregory BasshamPETER S. WILLIAMSFOUR Reply to Peter WilliamsGREGORY BASSHAMPart Two:THE ARGUMENT FROM REASONFIVE Pro: The Argument from Reason DefendedVICTOR REPPERTSIX Con: Naturalism UndefeatedDAVID KYLE JOHNSONSEVEN Reply to David Kyle JohnsonVICTOR REPPERTEIGHT Reply to Victor ReppertDAVID KYLE JOHNSONPart Three:THE MORAL ARGUMENTNINE Pro: The Moral Argument is ConvincingDAVID BAGGETTTEN Con: A Critique of the Moral ArgumentERIK J. WIELENBERGELEVEN: Reply to Erik WielenbergDAVID BAGGETTTWELVE Reply to David BaggettERIK J. WIELENBERGPart Four:THE TRILEMMA ARGUMENTTHIRTEEN Pro: A Defense of C. S. Lewis’s “Trilemma”DONALD S. WILLIAMSFOURTEEN Con: Lewis’s Trilemma: Case Not ProvenADAM BARKMANFIFTEEN Reply to Adam BarkmanDONALD S. WILLIAMSSIXTEEN Reply to Donald WilliamsADAM BARKMANPart Five:THE PROBLEM OF EVILSEVENTEEN Pro: The Problem of Pain DefendedPHILIP TALLONEIGHTEEN Con: C. S. Lewis on Evil: At Best a Likely StoryDAVID L. O’HARANINETEEN Reply to David L. O’HaraPHILIP TALLONTWENTY Reply to Philip TallonDAVID L. O’HARAWORKS CITEDTHE CONTRIBUTORSINDEX