Between Empire and Continent

Andreas Rose teaches Modern History at the University of Bonn. His research interests include the international history of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and the history of Britain and Germany. His recent publications include Die Außenpolitik des Wilhelminischen Kaiserreichs, 1890–1918 (2013) and, as coeditor, The Wars before the Great War: Conflict and International Politics before the Outbreak of the Great War (2015).

• List of Tables and IllustrationsAbbreviationsAcknowledgementsForeword by Sir Christopher ClarkIntroductionChapter 1. The Public Sphere in Edwardian LondonChapter 2. The Policy of Drift?: Balance of Power, Concert of Europe, or Political Power Blocs?Chapter 3. Safety First: The Politics of Defence and the Realities behind DiplomacyChapter 4. Imperial Defence or Continental Commitment?Chapter 5. Foreign Policy under Lansdowne and BalfourChapter 6. The Myth of Continuity: Foreign Policy under Edward GreyChapter 7. The Committee of Four: The German Peril RevisitedChapter 8. At the Cost of Stability: The Anglo-Russian Convention and its European ImplicationsChapter 9. ‘More Russian than the Russians’? British Balkan Diplomacy and the Annexation of Bosnia 1908/9
Conclusion and Perspectives: The Triad of British Foreign PoliticsBibliographyIndex

“Supported by a wealth of research and an extensive command of the historical literature on the subject, the book is important for academic libraries focusing on modern British history, diplomatic history, and the history of WW I…Highly recommended.” • Choice“Between Empire and Continent takes this reviewer’s understanding of events to an entirely different level and will no doubt become a key text. This is a book that offers much… It is a highly sophisticated piece of writing, and another close read of this fascinating study will no doubt produce many more important insights.” • American Historical Review“Likely to invigorate the revisionist interpretation of British foreign policy before 1914… The focus suggested by the title… is where future research should find a fruitful starting point.” • The Journal of Modern History“If Ranke actually held fast to his famous concept of the primacy of foreign policy, he might not have liked Rose's conclusions, but surely he would have approved the scholarship.” • The International History Review“The quality of this research is outstanding.” • William Mulligan, University of Dublin“Meticulously researched and masterfully argued… Rose skillfully demonstrates that, driven by domestic concerns and by the strategic challenge posed primarily by France and Russia, rather than Germany, Britain embarked on a radical overhaul of its foreign affairs.” • Thomas Weber, University of Aberdeen