Arguing about Disability

Kristjana Kristiansen is Associate Professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway. Simo Vehmas is Professor at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland.Tom Shakespeare is Research Fellow at the Policy, Ethics and Life Sciences Research Institute (PEALS), Newcastle University, UK.

• Introduction: The Unavoidable Alliance of Disability Studies and Philosophy Part 1: Metaphysics 1. Social Justice and Disability: Competing Interpretations of the Medical and Social Models 2. Definitions of Disability: Ethical and Other Values 3. The Ontology of Disability and Impairment: A Discussion of the Natural and Social Features 4. Disability and the Thinking Body Part 2: Political Philosophy 1. Personhood and the Social Inclusion of People with Disabilities: A Recognition-Theoretical Approach 2. Disability and Freedom 3. Disability, Non-Talent and Distributive Justice 4. Gender, Disability and Personal Identity: Moral and Political Problems in Community Thinking Part 3: Ethics 1. Cochlear Implants, Linguistic Rights, and ‘Open Future’ Arguments 2. The Moral Contestedness of Selecting ‘Deaf Embryos’ 3. The Role of Medical Experts in Shaping Disability Law 4. Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome: Why We Shouldn’t? 5. Biopolitics and Bare Life: Does the Impaired Body Provide Contemporary Examples of Homo Sacer?

'Arguing About Disability is one of the first books to attempt to bring together philosophy and disability and in so doing examine the complexity of disability. This important and comprehensive collection explores disability from a range of theoretical perspectives including the ontology of disability - how liberty, justice, equality and disability are linked, as well as ethics and disability - and gives new insights into current debates on disability. This collection is a welcome contribution to the maturing of disability studies and clearly shows the invaluable contribution that philosophy can make to debates on disability and disability research...'--Nick Watson, University of Glasgow, UK'One of the best qualities of this collection is its accessibility to both philosophers and disability studies scholars who may have little or no experience with the other field. The book's introduction by its editors makes a strong case for the productivity of the endeavor before giving a clear and concise overview of disability studies history, progressing through moral, medical, and social models, and providing a brief breakdown of those parts of philosophy that are relevant to the work...Arguing About Disability would be a beneficial introduction to the intersection of philosophy and disability studies.'--Disability Studies Quarterly'A rich collection of new insights from scholars in philosophy, bioethics, social science, law, disability studies and special education.'--Journal of Medical Ethics‘The papers in Arguing about Disability bring the analytical rigour of philosophy and the careful attention to empirical realities of disability studies together in insightful and helpful ways...Many of the papers in this collection are by leading experts in disability studies, social policy, and health law. The quality and interest of the papers confirms the renown of many of these thinkers. This work incorporates a rich range of theoretical backgrounds, while preserving its coherence as an anthology....It brings philosophical issues to bear in fruitful and readable ways, adding a depth to reflection on disability issues that other books and anthologies either lack, or presume the reader already possesses.’ -- Critical Social Policy'Anyone with any philosophical background who is interested in the field of disability studies, whether or not they count themselves as philosophers, ought to read [this book], and to engage with its arguments.'--Peter Herissone-Kelly, Metapsychology Online Reviews (2009)