Christopher McCorkindale is a lecturer in the Law School at Strathclyde University, UK and Marco Goldoni is a lecturer in Legal Theory at the University of Glasgow Law School, UK.

• Arendt and LawEdited byMarco Goldoni and Christopher McCorkindalePart I: Concepts of law in Arendt’s political thought1. Hans Lindahl, ‘Give and take: Arendt and the nomos of political community’ (2006) 32(2) Philosophy and Social Criticism pp.881 – 9012. Christian Volk, ‘From nomos to lex: Hannah Arendt on law, politics, and order’ (2010) 23(4) Leiden Journal of International Law pp.759 – 7793. Massimo La Torre, ‘Hannah Arendt and the Concept of Law. Against the Tradition’ (2013) 99(3) Archiv fuer Rechts und Sozialphilosphie pp.400–416.4. Jan Klabbers, ‘Possible Islands of Predictability: The Legal Thought of Hannah Arendt’ (2007) 20(1) Leiden Journal of International Law pp.1-23.5. Peg Birmingham, ‘On Violence, Politics, and the Law’ (2010) 24(1) Journal of Speculative Philosophy pp.1-20Part II: Constitution making and the riddle of foundation6. Jeremy Waldron, ‘Arendt’s constitutional politics’, in Dana Villa (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt (CUP, 2000), Ch.10, pp.201–2197. Robert P. Burns, ‘Arendt’s Constitutional Thought’, in James W. Bernauer (ed.), Amor Mundi: Explorations in the Faith and Thought of Hannah Arendt (Martinus Nijhoff, 1987), pp.157-1858. Jason Frank, Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Post-revolutionary America (Duke University Press, 2010), Ch.1, ‘Revolutions and Reiteration: Hannah Arendt’s Critique of Constituent Power’, pp.41-669. William E. Scheuerman, ‘Revolutions and Constitutions: Hannah Arendt’s Challenge to Carl Schmitt’ (1997) 10 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence pp.141-16210. Andreas Kalyvas, ‘The Republic of Councils’ (ch.9), Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary (CUP, 2009), pp.254-29111. Douglas Klusmeyer, ‘Hannah Arendt’s Case for Federalism’ (2010) 40(1) Publius pp.31-58.Part III: The politics of international law12. Andrew Arato and Jean Cohen, ‘Banishing the Sovereign: Internal and External Sovereignty in Arendt’, (2009) 16(2) Constellations pp.307-33013. Hauke Brunkhorst, ‘Reluctant democratic egalitarianism: Hannah Arendt’s idea of a revolutionary foundation of the modern nation state and international law’ (2008) 15(2) Ethical Perspectives pp.149-16714. Susan Marks, ‘Law and the Production of Superfluity’ (2011) 2(1) Transnational Legal Theory pp.1-2415. David Luban, ‘Hannah Arendt as a Theorist of International Criminal Law’ (2011) 11 International Criminal Law Review pp.621-64116. Leora Bilsky, ‘The Eichmann Trial and the Legacy of Jurisdiction’, in Seyla Benhabib et al (eds.), Politics in Dark Times: Encounters with Hannah Arendt (CUP, 2010), Ch.8, pp. 198-21817. Lida Maxwell, ‘Towards an agonistic understanding of law: Law and politics in Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem (2012) 11(1) Contemporary Political Theory pp.88-108Part IV: The Right to Have Rights18. Seyla Benhabib, ‘"The right to have rights": Hannah Arendt on the contradictions of the nation-state’ The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens pp. 49-70 (CUP, 2004),19. Frank I. Michelman, ‘Parsing "A Right to Have Rights"’ (1996) 3(2) Constellations pp.200-20820. Jean L. Cohen, ‘Rights, Citizenship, and the Modern Form of the Social: Dilemmas of Arendtian Republicansim’ (1996) 3(2) Constellations pp.164-18921. James D. Ingram, ‘What Is a "Right to Have Rights"? Three Images of the Politics of Human Rights’, (2008) 102(4) American Political Science Review pp.401-41622. Jacques Rancière, ‘Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man’ (2004) 103(2-3) South Atlantic Quarterly pp.297-31023. Andrew Schaap, ‘Enacting the right to have rights: Jacques Rancière’s critique of Hannah Arendt’ (2011) 10(1) European Journal of Political Theory pp.22-45