S. Zinaich Jr. is associate professor in the Department of History and Philosophy at Purdue University Northwest.

• ContentsPrefaceIntroduction1 The Ancient Greek period (429 B.C.–180 A.D.)2 The Scholastic Period (1265–1625)3 The Enlightenment: Hobbes, Pufendorf, Locke and Hume4 The Counter-Enlightenment Period and Romanticism (1770–1870)5 Austin, Hart, and Dworkin6 Toward a Theory of Legal NaturalismBibliographyIndexAbout the Author

Samuel Zinaich succeeds in formulating an approach to judicial interpretation that transcends limitations of both moral subjectivity and classic positivism. His arguments merit the attention of scholars in philosophy, legal theory, and the history of political thought.

S. Zinaich Jr. is associate professor in the Department of History and Philosophy at Purdue University Northwest.

• ContentsPrefaceIntroduction1 The Ancient Greek period (429 B.C.–180 A.D.)2 The Scholastic Period (1265–1625)3 The Enlightenment: Hobbes, Pufendorf, Locke and Hume4 The Counter-Enlightenment Period and Romanticism (1770–1870)5 Austin, Hart, and Dworkin6 Toward a Theory of Legal NaturalismBibliographyIndexAbout the Author

Samuel Zinaich succeeds in formulating an approach to judicial interpretation that transcends limitations of both moral subjectivity and classic positivism. His arguments merit the attention of scholars in philosophy, legal theory, and the history of political thought.

S. Zinaich Jr. is associate professor in the Department of History and Philosophy at Purdue University Northwest.

• ContentsPrefaceIntroduction1 The Ancient Greek period (429 B.C.–180 A.D.)2 The Scholastic Period (1265–1625)3 The Enlightenment: Hobbes, Pufendorf, Locke and Hume4 The Counter-Enlightenment Period and Romanticism (1770–1870)5 Austin, Hart, and Dworkin6 Toward a Theory of Legal NaturalismBibliographyIndexAbout the Author

Samuel Zinaich succeeds in formulating an approach to judicial interpretation that transcends limitations of both moral subjectivity and classic positivism. His arguments merit the attention of scholars in philosophy, legal theory, and the history of political thought.