Thibauld Moulaert, PhD is Associated professorat the Department of Social Work, University of Sherbrooke, Canada andpart-time Invited Professor at the Haute École de la Province de Namur (HEPN),Belgium.  After a postdoctoral Fellowshipin sociology at the National Fund for Scientific Research, UniversitéCatholique de Louvain, including a Visiting Research at King’s College London,UK in 2010, he works as a scientific coordinator of a 3 years internationalproject for REAICTIS (Réseau d’Étude International sur l’Âge, la Citoyenneté etl’Intégration Socio-économique) on older people volunteering and on olderpeople citizenship and environments. His first book Governing the End of the Career at a Distance. Outplacement and ActiveAgeing in Employment (Peter Lang, 2012) received a prize for publicationfrom the Fondation Universitaire; in 2013, he co-edited,with Jean-PhilippeViriot Durandal , a special issue on New perspectives on ageing through the‘duty of ageing well’ for the international review Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques. 14.00 Normal0 falsefalsefalse FR-BEX-NONEX-NONE

• The Challenges ofAging. – Population aging from a global and theoretical perspective. – Active Aging and Age-Friendly Cities: OneModel, Many Programs. – From the origins of AFC to the WHO global network. –Quebec: from research to policy from 7 pilot projects to 579 cities. – Sao Paulo:one action, three levels—state, city, and neighborhoods. – Hong Kong: thecentrality of participation. – Australia: proof of the “top-down” mistake. –France: is AFC brand new for French cities? Belgium/Wallonia: the limits of theWHO AFC model. – Waterloo, Ontario: AFC in action. – United States: when AFC isdeveloped further. – Manchester: is an urban perspective a means or an end? Challenges from and for Age-FriendlyCities. – Respecting the older subject: building AFC toward recognition. –The AFC model: between political economy and humanistic gerontology. – When AFCmeets policy. – Good and bad points about AFC​. Conclusion

Thibauld Moulaert, PhD is Associated professorat the Department of Social Work, University of Sherbrooke, Canada andpart-time Invited Professor at the Haute École de la Province de Namur (HEPN),Belgium.  After a postdoctoral Fellowshipin sociology at the National Fund for Scientific Research, UniversitéCatholique de Louvain, including a Visiting Research at King’s College London,UK in 2010, he works as a scientific coordinator of a 3 years internationalproject for REAICTIS (Réseau d’Étude International sur l’Âge, la Citoyenneté etl’Intégration Socio-économique) on older people volunteering and on olderpeople citizenship and environments. His first book Governing the End of the Career at a Distance. Outplacement and ActiveAgeing in Employment (Peter Lang, 2012) received a prize for publicationfrom the Fondation Universitaire; in 2013, he co-edited,with Jean-PhilippeViriot Durandal , a special issue on New perspectives on ageing through the‘duty of ageing well’ for the international review Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques. 14.00 Normal0 falsefalsefalse FR-BEX-NONEX-NONE

• The Challenges ofAging. – Population aging from a global and theoretical perspective. – Active Aging and Age-Friendly Cities: OneModel, Many Programs. – From the origins of AFC to the WHO global network. –Quebec: from research to policy from 7 pilot projects to 579 cities. – Sao Paulo:one action, three levels—state, city, and neighborhoods. – Hong Kong: thecentrality of participation. – Australia: proof of the “top-down” mistake. –France: is AFC brand new for French cities? Belgium/Wallonia: the limits of theWHO AFC model. – Waterloo, Ontario: AFC in action. – United States: when AFC isdeveloped further. – Manchester: is an urban perspective a means or an end? Challenges from and for Age-FriendlyCities. – Respecting the older subject: building AFC toward recognition. –The AFC model: between political economy and humanistic gerontology. – When AFCmeets policy. – Good and bad points about AFC​. Conclusion

Thibauld Moulaert, PhD is Associated professorat the Department of Social Work, University of Sherbrooke, Canada andpart-time Invited Professor at the Haute École de la Province de Namur (HEPN),Belgium.  After a postdoctoral Fellowshipin sociology at the National Fund for Scientific Research, UniversitéCatholique de Louvain, including a Visiting Research at King’s College London,UK in 2010, he works as a scientific coordinator of a 3 years internationalproject for REAICTIS (Réseau d’Étude International sur l’Âge, la Citoyenneté etl’Intégration Socio-économique) on older people volunteering and on olderpeople citizenship and environments. His first book Governing the End of the Career at a Distance. Outplacement and ActiveAgeing in Employment (Peter Lang, 2012) received a prize for publicationfrom the Fondation Universitaire; in 2013, he co-edited,with Jean-PhilippeViriot Durandal , a special issue on New perspectives on ageing through the‘duty of ageing well’ for the international review Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques. 14.00 Normal0 falsefalsefalse FR-BEX-NONEX-NONE

• The Challenges ofAging. – Population aging from a global and theoretical perspective. – Active Aging and Age-Friendly Cities: OneModel, Many Programs. – From the origins of AFC to the WHO global network. –Quebec: from research to policy from 7 pilot projects to 579 cities. – Sao Paulo:one action, three levels—state, city, and neighborhoods. – Hong Kong: thecentrality of participation. – Australia: proof of the “top-down” mistake. –France: is AFC brand new for French cities? Belgium/Wallonia: the limits of theWHO AFC model. – Waterloo, Ontario: AFC in action. – United States: when AFC isdeveloped further. – Manchester: is an urban perspective a means or an end? Challenges from and for Age-FriendlyCities. – Respecting the older subject: building AFC toward recognition. –The AFC model: between political economy and humanistic gerontology. – When AFCmeets policy. – Good and bad points about AFC​. Conclusion