Afterlife of Idealism

The Impact of New Idealism on British Historical and Political Thought, 1945-1980

Inbunden, Engelska, 2016

AvAdmir Skodo

689 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

Finns i fler format (1)

Häftad

709 kr

Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar

It shows that these historians used the new idealism to restate the nature of history and to revise modern English history against the backdrop of the intellectual, social and political problems of the welfare state period, thus making new idealist revisionism a key tradition in early postwar historiography.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2016-06-06
Mått148 x 210 x 23 mm
Vikt536 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
Antal sidor301
Upplaga16001
FörlagSpringer International Publishing AG
ISBN9783319293844

Tillhör följande kategorier

Introduction.-Chapter 1. Revisionist Potential: Historical Thought from Absolute to New Idealism.- .Chapter 2. The Philosophical Moment in Postwar Historiography.-Chapter 3. Revisionist Whiggism: Revisions of the English Past from the Tudors to the Victorians.-Chapter 4.The Political Thought of Revisionism.-Conclusion.-Appendix: Short Biographies of Key New Idealists and Early Postwar British Historians.

“The Afterlife of Idealism is a rich history that covers a complex landscape of political theory, historical writing, and social criticism from early post-war Britain. … the book is for a wide range of readers, from intellectual historians to those interested in the history of philosophy and historiography.” (Julia Moses, European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 26, 2018)“The Afterlife of Idealism offers another perspective on British historiography in one of its most fecund phases. In Skodo’s book Carr’s What is History? is not the starting point of post-war historical reflection; post-war historians were already caught up in historical philosophising and philosophical history. After The Afterlife of Idealism, Elton, Clark, Laslett, et al. are far harder to pigeon hole, far more plural in their predilections than may be popularly imagined.” (Jamie Melrose, Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, October, 2017)