Fran Humphries, Associate Professor, Law Futures Centre, Griffith Law School, Charles Lawson, Professor, Law Futures Centre, Griffith Law School, Griffith University, John A.H. Benzie, Acting Director, Aquatic Foods, WorldFish and Professor, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland and Clare Morrison, Lecturer, Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Australia

• Contents1 The relevance of access and benefit-sharing for aquaculture2 Flexibilities for accommodating international aquaticgenetic resource benefit-sharing for aquaculture 3 Scope and flexibility of access and benefit-sharing measuresin key aquaculture countries 4 Access and benefit-sharing procedures for genetic resourcesin aquaculture countries 5 Monitoring and compliance of aquaculture geneticresources and Traditional Knowledge regulation 6 Rethinking access and benefit-sharing in global aquaculture

‘This book comes at a timely moment, as the fundamental precepts of “access and benefit sharing” (ABS) as originally conceived under the CBD in 1992 are being called into question, and new models are under consideration in several United Nations fora. It fills in critical gaps in the evidentiary record for policy makers to learn from past experiences, and to develop new creative approaches for AqGRs in particular, and GRs, DSI and TK more generally.’

Fran Humphries, Associate Professor, Law Futures Centre, Griffith Law School, Charles Lawson, Professor, Law Futures Centre, Griffith Law School, Griffith University, John A.H. Benzie, Acting Director, Aquatic Foods, WorldFish and Professor, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland and Clare Morrison, Lecturer, Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Australia

• Contents1 The relevance of access and benefit-sharing for aquaculture2 Flexibilities for accommodating international aquaticgenetic resource benefit-sharing for aquaculture 3 Scope and flexibility of access and benefit-sharing measuresin key aquaculture countries 4 Access and benefit-sharing procedures for genetic resourcesin aquaculture countries 5 Monitoring and compliance of aquaculture geneticresources and Traditional Knowledge regulation 6 Rethinking access and benefit-sharing in global aquaculture

‘This book comes at a timely moment, as the fundamental precepts of “access and benefit sharing” (ABS) as originally conceived under the CBD in 1992 are being called into question, and new models are under consideration in several United Nations fora. It fills in critical gaps in the evidentiary record for policy makers to learn from past experiences, and to develop new creative approaches for AqGRs in particular, and GRs, DSI and TK more generally.’

Fran Humphries, Associate Professor, Law Futures Centre, Griffith Law School, Charles Lawson, Professor, Law Futures Centre, Griffith Law School, Griffith University, John A.H. Benzie, Acting Director, Aquatic Foods, WorldFish and Professor, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Ireland and Clare Morrison, Lecturer, Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Australia

• Contents1 The relevance of access and benefit-sharing for aquaculture2 Flexibilities for accommodating international aquaticgenetic resource benefit-sharing for aquaculture 3 Scope and flexibility of access and benefit-sharing measuresin key aquaculture countries 4 Access and benefit-sharing procedures for genetic resourcesin aquaculture countries 5 Monitoring and compliance of aquaculture geneticresources and Traditional Knowledge regulation 6 Rethinking access and benefit-sharing in global aquaculture

‘This book comes at a timely moment, as the fundamental precepts of “access and benefit sharing” (ABS) as originally conceived under the CBD in 1992 are being called into question, and new models are under consideration in several United Nations fora. It fills in critical gaps in the evidentiary record for policy makers to learn from past experiences, and to develop new creative approaches for AqGRs in particular, and GRs, DSI and TK more generally.’