Reilly (Northern Kentucky Univ.) and Ulbig (Sam Houston State) hypothesize that stress introduced into the voting process can have negative consequences for voters, causing some to decline to complete their ballots or to vote in ways inconsistent with their true policy preferences. Compelling introductions to each chapter pull from recent events covered in the news media and in previous research. The new contribution is data from a mock election experiment conducted at a large undergraduate university, with participants randomly assigned to having to wait to cast their ballots or being challenged at the polling place and directed to complete a provisional ballot. Prior to voting, participants completed a survey indicating their preferences on various issues; those issues were then incorporated into constitutional amendment ballot items on marijuana, abortion, and same-sex marriage. The estimated effect sizes are small and rarely statistically significant. Provisional ballots and long, arbitrary, and unexplained wait times do not seem to make voters more stressed or less able to express their preferences at the polls (at least in this one experiment). Further research is needed, but if the findings hold, this is good news for those who face adversity at the polls.Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students through faculty.