Extending the spatial and temporal boundaries of human space flight is an important goal for the nation and for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). However, human space flight remains an endeavor with substantial risks, and these risks must be identified, managed, and mitigated appropriately to achieve the nation's goals in space. The Bioastronautics Roadmap (BR) is the result of extensive, commendable efforts on the part of NASA to prioritize research efforts to meet these challenges. In 2003, NASA asked the Institute of Medicine (IOM), in collaboration with the Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences of the National Academies, to conduct a review of the BR. Specifically, NASA asked the committee to (1) conduct a comprehensive assessment and report of the strengths and weaknesses of the content and processes of the Bioastronautics Roadmap as applied to the missions described in the President's exploration initiative and (2) identify the unique challenges for accomplishing its goals and objectives.In September 2004, the committee released its preliminary report to NASA entitled Preliminary Considerations Regarding NASA's Bioastronautics Critical Path Roadmap. That document presented the committee's preliminary conclusions about the strengths and weaknesses of the April 2004 version of the BR. This report, A Risk Reductions Strategy for Human Exploration of Space, builds on those preliminary conclusions and provides recommendations to NASA about how to address the issues identified by the committee.
David Longnecker and Ricardo Molins, Editors, Committee on Review of NASA's Bioastronautics Roadmap, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1 Introduction; 4 2 Considerations Regarding the BR Content; 5 3 Considerations Regarding the BR Process; 6 4 Considerations Regarding the BR Context; 7 Appendix A Bibliography of Related National Academies Reports; 8 Appendix B Methods; 9 Appendix C Status of Countermeasure and Technology Readiness Levels; 10 Appendix D Bone Fracture Risk Associated with Prolonged Exposure to Microgravity; 11 Appendix E Integration of Data-Based Evidence and Expert Opinion in Decision Making; 12 Appendix F Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff; 13 Index
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Division of Natural Hazard Mitigation, Committee on Natural Disasters
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Division of Natural Hazard Mitigation, Committee on Natural Disasters
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee to Review the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Ecology Panel
Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Committee on the Longitudinal Study of Astronaut Health, Jr. Worth, Melvin H., Frederick J. Manning, David E. Longnecker
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board, Pamela L. Whitney, Richard B. Leshner, Jr. Byerly, Radford
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board, Committee for the Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board, James V. Zimmerman
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board, Committee on Environmental Satellite Data Utilization
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board, Committee on Science Opportunities Enabled by NASA's Constellation System
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board, Committee on the Rationale and Goals of the U.S. Civil Space Program
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board, Committee on NASA-NOAA Transition from Research to Operations
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Space Studies Board, Committee on a Decadal Strategy for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics)
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Space Studies Board, Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, Planning Committee on the Continuous Improvement of NASA's Innovation Ecosystem—A Workshop and Meetings of Experts, Robert Pool