The public depends on competent risk assessment from the federal government and the scientific community to grapple with the threat of pollution. When risk reports turn out to be overblown--or when risks are overlooked--public skepticism abounds. This comprehensive and readable book explores how the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can improve its risk assessment practices, with a focus on implementation of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. With a wealth of detailed information, pertinent examples, and revealing analysis, the volume explores the "default option" and other basic concepts. It offers two views of EPA operations: The first examines how EPA currently assesses exposure to hazardous air pollutants, evaluates the toxicity of a substance, and characterizes the risk to the public. The second, more holistic, view explores how EPA can improve in several critical areas of risk assessment by focusing on cross-cutting themes and incorporating more scientific judgment. This comprehensive volume will be important to the EPA and other agencies, risk managers, environmental advocates, scientists, faculty, students, and concerned individuals.
Committee on Risk Assessment of Hazardous Air Pollutants, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council
Front MatterExecutive Summary1 IntroductionPart I Current Approaches to Risk Assessment: 2 Risk Assessment and its Social and Regulatory Contexts3 Exposure Assessment4 Assessment of Toxicity5 Risk CharacterizationPart II Strategies for Improving Risk Assessment: 6 Default Options7 Models, Methods, and Data8 Data Needs9 Uncertainty10 Variability11 AggregationPart III Implementation of Findings: 12 ImplementationReferencesAppendix A: Risk Assessment Methodologies: EPAAppendix B: EPA Memorandum from Henry HabichtAppendix C: Calculation and Modeling of ExposureAppendix D: Working Paper for Considering Draft Revisions to the U.S. EPA Guidelines for Cancer Risk AssessmentAppendix E: Use of Pharmacokinetics to Extrapolate from Animal Data to HumansAppendix F: Uncertainty Analysis of Health Risk EstimatesAppendix G: Improvement in Human Health Risk Assessment Utilizing Site- and Chemical-Specific Information: A Case StudyAppendix H-1: Some Definitional Concerns About VariabilityAppendix H-2: Individual Susceptibility FactorsAppendix I: AggregationAppendix J: A Tiered Modeling Approach for Assessing the Risks Due to Sources of Hazardous Air PollutantsAppendix K: Science Advisory Board Memorandum on the Integrated Risk Information System and EPA ResponseAppendix L: Development of Data Used in Risk AssessmentAppendix M: Charge to the CommitteeAppendix N-1: The Case for Appendix N-2: Making Full Use of Scientific Information in Risk AssessmentIndex
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, and Applications Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Committee to Provide Interim Oversight of the DOE Nuclear Weapons Complex
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee to Review the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Ecology Panel
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Toxicology, Subcommittee on Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Hydrofluorocarbons
National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on the Future Role of Pesticides in US Agriculture
National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Toxicology, Subcommittee on Spacecraft Water Exposure Guidelines
National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Toxicology, Subcommittee on Toxicological Hazard and Risk Assessment
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter
National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Health Effects of Waste Incineration
National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee on Toxicology, Subcommittee on Manufactured Vitreous Fibers