When 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger died in a gene transfer study at the University of Pennsylvania, the national spotlight focused on the procedures used to ensure research participantsa (TM) safety and their capacity to safeguard the well-being of those who volunteer for research studies. Responsible Research outlines a three-pronged approach to ensure the protection of every participant through the establishment of effective Human Research Participant Protection Programs (HRPPPs). The approach includes: * Improved research review processes, * Recognition and integration of research participantsa (TM) contributions to the system, and * Vigilant maintenance of HRPPP performance. Issues addressed in the book include the need for in-depth, complimentary reviews of science, ethics, and conflict of interest reviews; desired qualifications for investigators and reviewers; the process of informed consent; federal and institutional oversight; and the role of accreditation. Recommendations for areas of key interest include suggestions for legislative approaches, compensation for research-related injury, and the refocusing of the mission of institutional review boards.Responsible Research will be important to anyone interested in the issues that are relevant to the practice of using human subjects as research participants, but especially so to policy makers, research administrators, investigators, and research sponsors a " but also including volunteers who may agree to serve as research participants.
Daniel D. Federman, Kathi E. Hanna, and Laura Lyman Rodriguez, Editors, Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1 Introduction; 4 2 A Systematic Approach to Human Research Participant Protection Programs; 5 3 Back to Basics: A Scientific, Conflict of Interest, and Ethical Review of Research Protocols; 6 4 The Participant-Investigator Interface; 7 5 Improving Protection Through Oversight and Data and Safety Monitoring; 8 6 Improving Human Research Participant Protection Program Performance and Clarifying Roles; 9 7 Improving an Evolving National Human Research Participant Protection System; 10 References; 11 Appendix A: Data Sources and Methods; 12 Appendix B: Protecting Particpants in Social, Behavioral, and Economic Science Research: Issues, Current Problems, and ..; 13 Appendix C: Clarifying Protocol Accountability; 14 Appendix D: Committee Biographies; 15 Index
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
Institute of Medicine, Board on the Health of Select Populations, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual
Institute of Medicine, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Division of International Health
Institute of Medicine, Committee to Develop Methods Useful to the Department of Veteran Affairs in Estimating Its Physician Requirements, Joseph Lipscomb
Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Medical Follow-Up Agency, Committee on Alternative Funding Strategies for DOD's Peer Reviewed Medical Research Programs, Kathi E. Hanna, Michael McGeary
Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Sciences Policy, and Medical Devices Roundtable on Research and Development of Drugs, Biologics, Andrew Pope, Peter Bouxsein, Frederick J. Manning, Kathi E. Hanna
National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, and Law Committee on Science, Technology, Committee on Daubert Standards, Anne-Marie Mazza, Kathi E. Hanna