"Rich with cross-discipline potential, Feder's engaging argument should provide a new approach for doctors and parents caring for children with atypical sex anatomy."—Publishers Weekly (Starred Review)"Feder's book is a welcome injection of new ideas into feminist scholarship on intersex, post-Consensus Statement era."—Women's Review of Books"Is a work of philosophy capable of bringing insightful new perspectives or illuminating and forceful arguments to an urgent social matter so as truly to effect a felt change in the lives of people concerned by it? Feder's book is capable of this effect. As such, it takes the risk of calling forth a new public, or a new readership, and so is a work whose appeal could well be ahead of its time. But its time should be here."—International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics"Making Sense of Intersex significantly enhances our understanding of intersex and the ethical issues involved in medical practice more generally."—Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal"Making Sense of Intersex is an impressive call for change. As such it is in conversation with intersex activist and scholarly work."—philoSOPHIA"Just when you thought nothing more could be added to intersex scholarship, Ellen Feder, a compassionate philosopher, uses the tools of her discipline to expand our understanding. Drawing on chilling stories of the treatment of children with "Disorders of Sexual Differentiation," she tackles questions like: What constitutes good medical care? Why are children's needs subverted? What underlies the compelling appeal of normality and aversion to intersexuality?"—Suzanne Kessler, Lessons from the Intersexed"In Making Sense of Intersex, Ellen K. Feder expertly employs the tools of the medical humanities to examine the thoughts, desires, and growth potential of the parents and clinicians who care for children born intersex—with sex chromosomes, hormones, or body parts that don't quite match medical standards for males or females. Rather than the usual and often misguided emphasis on gender identity development and its attendant politics, Feder focuses instead on how parents love and how clinicians care. The result is a powerfully sympathetic and deeply moving call to a better way for all of us."—Alice Dreger, Northwestern University"Feder's exploration of the ethics of intersex treatment is a cautionary tale for health care providers and families. Her analysis highlights serious deficiencies in the contemporary process of informed consent. As a physician, mother of adults with atypical sex, and moderator of a family support group, I strongly urge clinicians involved in the care of these children to read this book . Feder makes it clear that the prevailing model of decision-making for irreversible treatments such as surgery and hormonal therapy relies on the flawed premise that these treatments will prevent harm to children and families despite evidence that they actually cause harm. Assuming that information overload will paralyze anxious families, physicians fail to provide balanced education on long-term effects. In dismissing input from the ultimate experts, patients with lived experience of lasting physical and emotional trauma, clinicians neglect their primary moral obligation to vulnerable families. By the time parents learn of their child's right to sexual integrity, physical change is irrevocable. It is too late to restore the original "outer self" integral to the core sense of being whole that lets a child engage with the world, love and be loved."—Arlene Baratz, Medical Advisor, AIS-DSD Support Group"An important book for bioethics as well as theories of gender and sexuality. A gripping narrative with clarity of purpose and ease with major philosophical approaches to ethics and sexuality."—Cynthia Willett, Emory University"Linking the problems raised by treatment of the intersexed to problems that are endemic to the field of bioethics, Feder argues that, in seeing itself charged with the task of solving specific case problems, bioethics has abandoned its philosophical mission of examining the ways that these case problems are framed and neglected its philosophical obligation to critique the context within which bioethics is asked to operate. A controversial and radical conclusion, yes, but one that is skillfully defended."—Debra Bergoffen, author of Contesting the Politics of Genocidal Rape: Affirming the Dignity of the Vulnerable Body
