Although billions of dollars have been spent on crime prevention and control programs during the past decade, scientifically strong impact evaluations of these programs are uncommon in the context of the overall number of programs that have received funding. Improving Evaluation of Anticrime Programs is designed as a working guide for agencies and organizations responsible for program evaluation, for researchers who must design scientifically credible evaluations of government and privately sponsored programs, and for policy officials who are investing more and more in the concept of evidence-based policy to guide their decisions in crucial areas of crime prevention and control.
Mark W. Lipsey, Editor, Committee on Improving Evaluation of Anti-Crime Programs, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1 Introduction; 4 2 What Questions Should the Evaluation Address?; 5 3 When Is an Impact Evaluation Appropriate?; 6 4 How Should an Impact Evaluation Be Designed?; 7 5 How Should the Evaluation Be Implemented?; 8 6 What Organizational Infrastructure and Procedures Support High-Quality Evaluation?; 9 7 Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations: Priorities and Focus; 10 References; 11 Appendix A Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff; 12 Appendix B Participant List: Workshop on Improving Evaluation of Criminal Justice Programs
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Division of Natural Hazard Mitigation, Committee on Natural Disasters
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee to Review the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Ecology Panel