Examining our relationships with architecture beyond human-centric perspectives, Xenoaesthetics challenges conventional views of design and space inhabitation by exploring the architectural project as an autonomous entity. Drawing together insights from philosophy and architecture, this book delves into the conditions, roles, and implications of architectural encounters, conceptualising the architectural project as a site of unity-multiplicity tension, and introducing the concept of xenoaesthetics as a cognitive mode attuned to this structure. This approach invites readers to reimagine architectural experience as a dual action that reveals the project to us and realizes itself through us. As well as implying disciplinary consequences for design questions, Vaillo’s work holds socio-political significance for our everyday architectural interactions, contributing to the quest for practices and discourses on equality. Methodologically, his argument draws from Object-Oriented Ontology and the architect Enric Miralles, offering an additional retrospective crossover that enriches both references.A resource for students, architects, scholars, and enthusiasts interested in exploring architecture beyond assumptions and prescribed value systems, Xenoaesthetics encourages a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship between humans and the architectural project.
Gonzalo Vaillo is a Postdoctorate Researcher at the Department of Experimental Architecture - Building Design and Construction at the University of Innsbruck, Austria, and founder principal of the architectural office MORPHtopia.
Prologue by Graham HarmanAcknowledgementsIntroductionPart I: The Xenological Framework1. The Architectural Project as Object2. The Cognitive-unit3. The Xenoaesthetic ApproachPart II: Deep cognition 4. The Immaterial Experience of Unity5. The Role of the Cognizer6. Vertical technePart III: Open Cognition 7. The Infrastructure of Experience 8. Designing9. InhabitingConclusionBibliography
What is there left for architects to theorize after post-structuralism? The majority has stopped theorizing architecture altogether, while a small group wants to do so afresh. Gonzalo Vaillo is right: we may theorize architecture only in its totality and its self-enclosed strangeness. Vaillo’s book is an essential read to see how this may work out.