It is easy to underestimate how little was known about crimes and victims before the findings of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) became common wisdom. In the late 1960s, knowledge of crimes and their victims came largely from reports filed by local police agencies as part of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) system, as well as from studies of the files held by individual police departments. Criminologists understood that there existed a "dark figure" of crime consisting of events not reported to the police. However, over the course of the last decade, the effectiveness of the NCVS has been undermined by the demands of conducting an increasingly expensive survey in an effectively flat-line budgetary environment. Surveying Victims: Options for Conducting the National Crime Victimization Survey, reviews the programs of the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS.) Specifically, it explores alternative options for conducting the NCVS, which is the largest BJS program.This book describes various design possibilities and their implications relative to three basic goals; flexibility, in terms of both content and analysis; utility for gathering information on crimes that are not well reported to police; and small-domain estimation, including providing information on states or localities. This book finds that, as currently configured and funded, the NCVS is not achieving and cannot achieve BJS's mandated goal to "collect and analyze data that will serve as a continuous indication of the incidence and attributes of crime." Accordingly, Surveying Victims recommends that BJS be afforded the budgetary resources necessary to generate accurate measure of victimization.
Robert M. Groves and Daniel L. Cork, Editors, Panel to Review the Programs of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1 Introduction; 4 2 Goals of the National Crime Victimization Survey; 5 3 Current Demands and Constraints on the National Crime Victimization Survey; 6 4 Matching Design Features to Desired Goals; 7 5 Decision-Making Process for a New Victimization Measurement System; 8 References; 9 Appendixes; 10 Appendix A: Findings and Recommendations; 11 Appendix B: Principal Findings and Recommendations of the National Research Council (1976b) Study; 12 Appendix C: Procedures and Operations of the National Crime Victimization Survey; 13 Appendix D: The Uniform Crime Reporting Program; 14 Appendix E: Other Victimization Surveys: International and U.S. State and Local Experience; 15 Appendix F: Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Superhard Materials
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Panel on Effects of Past Global Change on Life
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Modernizing the Nation's Crime Statistics, Daniel L. Cork, Janet L. Lauritsen
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Review the Programs of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Daniel L. Cork, Robert M. Groves
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Committee on Law and Justice, and Technical Capability of a National Ballistics Database Committee to Assess the Feasibility, Accuracy, Carol V. Petrie, Eugene S. Meieran, John E. Rolph, Daniel L. Cork
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Cybercrime Classification and Measurement, Daniel L. Cork, Hal S. Stern
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Improving Federal Statistics for Policy and Social Science Research Using Multiple Data Sources and State-of-the-Art Estimation Methods, Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Robert M. Groves
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, and Key Characteristics of a 21st-Century Data Infrastructure Panel on the Scope, Components, Michael Siri, Thomas Mesenbourg, Robert M. Groves
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, Lawrence D. Brown
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Evaluate the Quality of the 2020 Census, Daniel L. Cork, Teresa A. Sullivan
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Improving Federal Statistics for Policy and Social Science Research Using Multiple Data Sources and State-of-the-Art Estimation Methods, Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Robert M. Groves