The decennial census was the federal governmenta (TM)s largest and most complex peacetime operation. This report of a panel of the National Research Councila (TM)s Committee on National Statistics comprehensively reviews the conduct of the 2000 census and the quality of the resulting data. The panela (TM)s findings cover the planning process for 2000, which was marked by an atmosphere of intense controversy about the proposed role of statistical techniques in the census enumeration and possible adjustment for errors in counting the population. The report addresses the success and problems of major innovations in census operations, the completeness of population coverage in 2000, and the quality of both the basic demographic data collected from all census respondents and the detailed socioeconomic data collected from the census long-form sample (about one-sixth of the population). The panel draws comparisons with the 1990 experience and recommends improvements in the planning process and design for 2010. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity will be an invaluable resource for users of the 2000 data and for policymakers and census planners.It provides a trove of information about the issues that have fueled debate about the census process and about the operations and quality of the nationa (TM)s twenty-second decennial enumeration.
Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, and Janet L. Norwood, Editors, Panel to Review the 2000 Census, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1 Introduction and Overview; 4 2 Census Goals and Uses; 5 3 The Road to 2000; 6 4 Assessment of 2000 Census Operations; 7 5 Coverage Evaluation: Methods and Background; 8 6 The 2000 Coverage Evaluation Program; 9 7 Assessment of Basic and Long-Form-Sample Data; 10 8 Race and Ethnicity Measurement; 11 9 Management and Research; 12 10 Detailed Findings and Recommendations; 13 Appendix A: Panel Activities and Prior Reports; 14 Appendix B: Questionnaire Items on the 2000 and 1990 Censuses and Census 2000 Supplementary Survey; 15 Appendix C: Census Operations; 16 Appendix D: Completeness of Census Returns; 17 Appendix E: A.C.E. Operations; 18 Appendix F: Methods for Treating Missing Data; 19 Appendix G: 2000 Census Basic (Complete-Count) Data Processing; 20 Appendix H: 2000 Census Long-Form-Sample Data Processing; 21 Appendix I: Census 2000 Evaluations and Experiments; 22 Glossary and Abbreviations; 23 Bibliography; 24 Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff; 25 Index to Chapters 1-10
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Superhard Materials
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Panel on Effects of Past Global Change on Life
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Janet L. Norwood, Daniel L. Cork, Constance F. Citro
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Review the U.S Department of Agriculture's Measurement of Food Insecurity and Hunger, Janet L. Norwood, Gooloo S. Wunderlich
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Review the 2010 Census, Daniel L. Cork, Janet L. Norwood, Thomas M. Cook
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on the Design of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, Lawrence D. Brown
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Nancy J. Kirkendall, Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Panel on Statistical Programs and Practices of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Janet L. Norwood, Constance F. Citro
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Residence Rules in the Decennial Census, Paul R. Voss, Daniel L. Cork
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Benjamin F. King, Michael L. Cohen, Daniel L. Cork
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Review the Programs of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Daniel L. Cork, Robert M. Groves
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Evaluate the Quality of the 2020 Census, Daniel L. Cork, Teresa A. Sullivan