All U.S. agencies with counterterrorism programs that collect or "mine" personal data -- such as phone records or Web sites visited -- should be required to evaluate the programs' effectiveness, lawfulness, and impacts on privacy. A framework is offered that agencies can use to evaluate such information-based programs, both classified and unclassified. The book urges Congress to re-examine existing privacy law to assess how privacy can be protected in current and future programs and recommends that any individuals harmed by violations of privacy be given a meaningful form of redress. Two specific technologies are examined: data mining and behavioral surveillance. Regarding data mining, the book concludes that although these methods have been useful in the private sector for spotting consumer fraud, they are less helpful for counterterrorism because so little is known about what patterns indicate terrorist activity.Regarding behavioral surveillance in a counterterrorist context, the book concludes that although research and development on certain aspects of this topic are warranted, there is no scientific consensus on whether these techniques are ready for operational use at all in counterterrorism.
Committee on Technical and Privacy Dimensions of Information for Terrorism Prevention and Other National Goals, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1 Scoping the Issue: Terrorism, Privacy, and Technology; 4 2 A Framework for Evaluating Information-Based Programs to Fight Terrorism or Serve Other Important National Goals; 5 3 Conclusions and Recommendations; 6 Appendixes; 7 Appendix A: Acronyms; 8 Appendix B: Terrorism and Terrorists; 9 Appendix C: Information and Information Technology; 10 Appendix D: The Life Cycle of Technology, Systems, and Programs; 11 Appendix E: Hypothetical and Illustrative Applications of the Framework to Various Scenarios; 12 Appendix F: Privacy-Related Law and Regulation: The State of the Law and Outstanding Issues; 13 Appendix G: The Jurisprudence of Privacy Law and the Need for Independent Oversight; 14 Appendix H: Data Mining and Information Fusion; 15 Appendix I: Illustrative Government Data Mining Programs and Activity; 16 Appendix J: The Total/Terrorist Information Awareness Program; 17 Appendix K: Behavioral-Surveillance Techniques and Technologies; 18 Appendix L: The Science and Technology of Privacy Protection; 19 Appendix M: Public Opinion Data on U.S. Attitudes Toward Government Counterterrorism Efforts; 20 Appendix N: Committee and Staff Biographical Information; 21 Appendix O: Meeting Participants and Other Contributors
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, and Applications Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Committee to Provide Interim Oversight of the DOE Nuclear Weapons Complex
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Committee to Review the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Ecology Panel
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Sensory Sciences Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, Committee on National Statistics, and Social Science Research Panel on Institutional Review Boards, Surveys, Cora B. Marrett, Daniel R. Ilgen, Constance F. Citro
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Cybercrime Classification and Measurement, Daniel L. Cork, Hal S. Stern
National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Health Sciences Policy, and Independence Forum on Aging, Disability, Tracy A. Lustig, Victoria Weisfeld
National Research Council, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Sensory Sciences Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, and Review Standing Committee for Technology Insight--Gauge, Evaluate, Committee on Military and Intelligence Methodology for Emergent Neurophysiological and Cognitive/Neural Science Research in the Next Two Decades
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Committee on Law and Justice
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Modernizing the Nation's Crime Statistics, Daniel L. Cork, Janet L. Lauritsen
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Policy and Global Affairs, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Committee on Law and Justice, and Law Committee on Science, Technology, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, and Governance Committee on Facial Recognition: Current Capabilities, Future Prospects
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on National Statistics, Panel to Review the Programs of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Daniel L. Cork, Robert M. Groves
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Committee on Law and Justice
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Committee on Law and Justice, Carol V. Petrie, John V. Pepper