Institutional review boards (IRBs) are the linchpins of the protection systems that govern human participation in research. In recent years, high-profile cases have focused attention on the weaknesses of the procedures for protecting participants in medical research. The issues surrounding participants protection in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences may be less visible to the public eye, but they are no less important in ensuring ethical and responsible research. This report examines three key issues related to human participation in social, behavioral, and economic sciences research: (1) obtaining informed, voluntary consent from prospective participants: (2) guaranteeing the confidentiality of information collected from participants, which is a particularly challenging problem in social sciences research; and (3) using appropriate review procedures for a /minimal-riska research. Protecting Participants and Facilitating Social and Behavioral Sciences Research will be important to policy makers, research administrators, research sponsors, IRB members, and investigators.More generally, it contains important information for all who want to ensure the best protectiona "for participants and researchers alikea "in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences.
Constance F. Citro, Daniel R. Ilgen, and Cora B. Marrett, Editors, Panel on Institutional Review Boards, Surveys, and Social Science Research, National Research Council
1 Front Matter; 2 Executive Summary; 3 1 Introduction; 4 2 Basic Concepts; 5 3 Regulatory History; 6 4 Enhancing Informed Consent; 7 5 Enhancing Confidentiality Protection; 8 6 Enhancing the Effectiveness of Review: Minimal-Risk Research; 9 7 System Issues; 10 References; 11 Appendix A: Tracing Changes in Regulatory Language; 12 Appendix B: Organizations and Resources for Human Research Participant Protection; 13 Appendix C: Agenda for Panel's First Meeting; 14 Appendix D: Selected Studies of IRB Operations: Summary Descriptions; 15 Appendix E: Confidentiality and Data Access Issues for Institutional Review Boards; 16 Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences, Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Dog and Cat Nutrition
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Horses
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Superhard Materials
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, Committee on Alternative Chemical Demilitarization Technologies
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Committee on Law and Justice, Committee on Technical and Privacy Dimensions of Information for Terrorism Prevention and Other National Goals
National Research Council, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Sensory Sciences Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, and Review Standing Committee for Technology Insight--Gauge, Evaluate, Committee on Military and Intelligence Methodology for Emergent Neurophysiological and Cognitive/Neural Science Research in the Next Two Decades
National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Constance F. Citro, Miron L. Straf, Margaret E. Martin
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination, Constance F. Citro, Marilyn Dabady, Rebecca M. Blank
and Medicine National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Michael L. Cohen, Constance F. Citro
National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographic Areas, Graham Kalton, Constance F. Citro
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, John Pepper, Charles F. Manski, Constance F. Citro
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics, Miron L. Straf, Constance F. Citro
National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Health Sciences Policy, and Independence Forum on Aging, Disability, Tracy A. Lustig, Victoria Weisfeld