Del 54 i serien Studia Semitica Neerlandica

Lexical Field of the Substantives of “Gift” in Ancient Hebrew

Inbunden, Engelska, 2010

4 649 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.

This monograph exhaustively investigates the semantic domain of ‘gift’ in Ancient Hebrew, which comprises 28 substantives. The investigation firstly focuses on the syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations that determine the meanings of each individual lexeme and subsequently provides an overall picture of the developments and extensions of the whole lexical field across the different layers of Ancient Hebrew. The investigation sheds new light on the debated issue of the so-called sectarian Qumran writings, by demonstrating that they attest to distinctive patterns of lexical organisation that are not found elsewhere in Ancient Hebrew. The appendix finally discusses the feasibility of drawing concept related conclusions on the basis of linguistic data, thus sketching a possible map of the concept of ‘gift’.

Produktinformation

Utgivningsdatum2010-07-07
Mått155 x 235 x 37 mm
Vikt946 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
SerieStudia Semitica Neerlandica
Antal sidor478
FörlagBrill
ISBN9789004178731

Tillhör följande kategorier

CONTENTSAcknowledgements ............................................................................ xiForeword ............................................................................................. xiiiAbbreviations ..................................................................................... xvMethodological Framework ............................................................. 11 Biblical Hebrew or Ancient Hebrew? Between Languageand Corpus .............................................................................. 12 Componential Analysis of Meaning .................................... 122.1 Why Componential Analysis of Meaning? ............... 122.2 Theoretical Framework ................................................ 152.3 Research Procedures of Componential Analysis ..... 373 Between Synchrony and Diachrony: ComponentialAnalysis and the Issue of Linguistic Change ....................... 464 Componential Analysis as a Heuristic Tool for CognitiveSemantics? Some Methodological Considerations ........... 52Part One Distributional and Syntagmatic Analysis .................. 63Lexeme 1: 63 ............................................................................ אֶשְׁכָּרLexeme 2: 66 ............................................................... אֶתְנָה / אֶתְנַןLexeme 3: 74 ............................................................................. בְּרָכָהLexeme 4: 82 ......................................................................... הַבְ ׇ הבִיםLexeme 5: 84 ................................................................................ זֶבֶדLexeme 6: 90 ............................................................................... כֹּפֶרLexeme 7: 103 ................................................................................ מֶגֶדLexeme 8: 107 .......................................................................... מִגְדָּנוֺתLexeme 9: 111 ............................................................................... מֹהַרLexeme 10: 115 .............................................................................. מָנָהLexeme 11: 128 ........................................................................... מִנְחָהLexeme 12: 165 ......................................................................... מַשְֺאֵתLexeme 13: 175 .............................................................................. מַתָּןLexeme 14: 181 ........................................................................... מַתָּנָהLexeme 15: 196 ............................................................................ מַתָּתLexeme 16: 203 ............................................................................ נְדָבָהLexeme 17: 219 .............................................................................. נֵדֶהLexeme 18: 221 ............................................................................... נָדָןLexeme 19: 223 .............................................................................. נֶדֶרLexeme 20: 240 ............................................................................ קָרְבָּןLexeme 21: 253 ............................................................................. שָׂכָרLexeme 22: 265 ............................................................................ שֹׁחַדLexeme 23: 277 ................................................................................ שַׁיLexeme 24: 280 ....................................................................... שִׁלּוּחִיםLexeme 25: 284 ........................................................... שִׁלּוּ ׇ מה / שִׁלּוּםLexeme 26: 292 ....................................................................... שַׁלְמֹנִיםLexeme 27: 295 ......................................................................... תְּרוּמָהLexeme 28: 316 ........................................................................ תְּשׁוּרָהPart Two Paradigmatic Analysis .................................................. 319Lexeme 1: 319 ............................................................................ אֶשְׁכָּרLexeme 2: 320 ............................................................... אֶתְנָה / אֶתְנַןLexeme 3: 322 ............................................................................. בְּרָכָהLexeme 4: 324 ......................................................................... הַבְ ׇ הבִיםLexeme 5: 325 ................................................................................ זֶבֶדLexeme 6: 326 ............................................................................... כֹּפֶרLexeme 7: 330 ................................................................................ מֶגֶדLexeme 8: 331 .......................................................................... מִגְדָּנוֹתLexeme 9: 333 ............................................................................... מֹהַרLexeme 10: 335 .............................................................................. מָנָהLexeme 11: 338 ........................................................................... מִנְחָהLexeme 12: 345 ......................................................................... מַשְֺאֵתLexeme 13: 348 .............................................................................. מַתָּןLexeme 14: 351 ........................................................................... מַתָּנָהLexeme 15: 355 ............................................................................ מַתָּתLexeme 16: 358 ............................................................................ נְדָבָהLexeme 17: 361 .............................................................................. נֵדֶהLexeme 18: 362 ............................................................................... נָדָןLexeme 19: 363 .............................................................................. נֶדֶרLexeme 20: 367 ............................................................................ קָרְבָּןLexeme 21: 370 ............................................................................. שָׂכָרLexeme 22: 374 ............................................................................ שֹׁחַדLexeme 23: 377 ................................................................................ שַׁיLexeme 24: 379 ....................................................................... שִׁלּוּחִיםLexeme 25: 380 ........................................................... שִׁלּוּ ׇ מה / שִׁלּוּםLexeme 26: 382 ....................................................................... שַׁלְמֹנִיםLexeme 27: 384 ......................................................................... תְּרוּמָהLexeme 28: 388 ........................................................................ תְּשׁוּרָהPart Three A Synoptic Overview ................................................. 389Section 1: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inArchaic Biblical Hebrew .......................................................... 389Section 2: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inStandard Narrative Hebrew .................................................... 391Section 3: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inStandard Poetic Hebrew .......................................................... 394Section 4: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inStandard Juridical-Cultic Hebrew .......................................... 397Section 5: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inLate Narrative Hebrew ............................................................. 400Section 6: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inLate Poetic Hebrew ................................................................... 402Section 7: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inBen Sira Hebrew ....................................................................... 404Section 8: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inthe Narrative Language of Qumran ...................................... 406Section 9: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inthe Poetic Language of Qumran ............................................ 407Section 10: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inthe Juridical-Cultic Language of Qumran ............................ 409Section 11: The Lexical Field of the Substantives of ‘Gift’ inthe Sectarian Language of Qumran ....................................... 411Part Four Final Glossary ............................................................... 415Appendix Language and Culture: Towards the Conceptof ‘Gift’ ............................................................................................ 443Bibliography ........................................................................................ 453Index of References ........................................................................... 465Index of Authors ................................................................................ 472

"Zanella consistently sets out his position clearly and creatively, and justifies it lucidly and persuasively. There is, ultimately, no doubt that Zanella has succeeded in what he set out to do -- to provide a set of objective, coherent and useful results concerning the lexical field of 'gift' in Ancient Hebrew, while acknowledging that those results must remain 'partial, relative, and connected to a specific semantic theory' (p. 61)." Marilyn Burton, University of Edinburgh in The Expository Times vol. 124, no. 12, September 2013, pp. 619-620.