Box Office Archaeology

Julie M. Schablitsky's academic and research pursuits are launched from the University of Oregon, Museum of Natural and Cultural History where she holds an adjunct professorship and directs excavations on American pioneer sites and Oregon Chinatowns.

• Chapter 1 The Way of the Archaeologist, Julie M. Schablitsky; Chapter 2 Unwrapping the Mummy, Stuart Tyson Smith; Chapter 3 Vikings, Vixens, and Valhalla, Mark Axel Tveskov, Jon M. Erlandson; Chapter 4 A Pirate's Life for Me!; Chapter 5 Titanic, James P. Delgado; Chapter 6 Voyage from Myth, Robert S. Neyland; Chapter 7 Pocahontas Unanimated, Randy Amici; Chapter 8 The Life and Times of the Ever-Changing Hollywood Indian, Charles M. Haecker; Chapter 9 Imagining Blackness, Paul R. Mullins; Chapter 10 Five Points on Film, Rebecca Yamin, Lauren J. Cook; Chapter 11 Western Boomtowns, Julie M. Schablitsky; Chapter 12 Contesting Hollywood's Chinatowns, Bryn Williams, Stacey Camp; Chapter 13 When the Legend Becomes Fact, Vergil E. Noble;

'Discerning audiences can tell the difference between Victorian and Edwardian dress, Viking longboats and Greek fishing boats. Archaeology has helped with the verisimilitude of sets and the background for the action; however, the tale drives the characters and the action, whether strictly true or mythic, and these are in the hands of script and director. Strong chapters by archaeologists look at the movies [...].The authors are master archaeologists and fans of the cinema--a fine combination. Summing Up: Highly recommended.' C.S. Peebles, CHOICE Magazine 'This curious book will appeal to archaeologists who are annoyed when Hollywood constructs fi lm plots that do not conform to their understanding of the evidences and, far more importantly, to teachers who intend to teach history through a commentary on filmic representations...Of course we can all be fascinated by film representations of our discipline, but ultimately technical critiques such as those found throughout Box Office Archaeology must been seen as statements about archaeology rather than about cinema.' Peter Hiscock, Australian Archaeology