Bolsheviks Come to Power

Alexander Rabinowitch is is an affiliated research scholar at St. Petersburg Institute of History, Russian Academy of Sciences, and professor of history at Indiana University. He is the author of Prelude to Revolution and The Bolsheviks in Power.

• List of IllustrationsAcknowledgementsNote on Transliteration, Dates, and TerminologyIntroduction1. The July Uprising2. The Bolsheviks Under Fire3. Petrograd During the Reaction4. The Ineffectiveness of Repression5. The Bolshevik Resurgence6. The Rise of Kornilov7. Kornilov Versus Kerensky8. The Bolsheviks and Kornilov's Defeat9. The Question of a New Government10. "All Power to the Soviets"11. Lenin's Campaign For an Insurrection12. Obstacles to an Uprising13. The Garrison Crisis and the Military Revolutionary Committee14. On the Eve15. The Bolsheviks Come to Power16. Epilogue

"Superb, meticulous, detailed, exciting, indispensable.”—China Miéville, October“Five crucial months in the history of the Russian Revolution are portrayed here with a wealth of new data. The Bolsheviks, lifting themselves up from a seemingly fatal slump in their fortunes in July 1917, moved to their successful bid for power in October.... Quite a number of preconceptions are dispelled in this work by Rabinowitch…. We see the Bolsheviks in action-debating, hesitating, deeply disagreeing on policies, fiercely contesting Lenin's ideas—a far cry from the monolithic avant-garde some writers still believe the Party to have been.”—Moshé Lewin"Notable... for its soundness of judgment, clarity of expression, and wealth of illuminating detail. Our understanding of what happened in 1917 has been significantly enhanced by Rabinowitch's careful research. The Bolsheviks Come to Power should be read by every person interested in the Russian Revolution.”—Paul Avrich, author The Russian Anarchists“Rabinowitch comes to several conclusions: First, the Bolshevik program of land, peace, and bread had widespread support among the masses; he states that 'as a result, in October the goals of the Bolsheviks, as the masses understood them, had strong popular support’.... Second, the Bolshevik program achieved this popularity precisely because of the inability-or lack of desire-of other political parties to respond to these demands. Third, moderate socialist parties' continued support of Kerensky and the Provisional Government undermined their credibility in the eyes of the masses. And fourth, 'In Petrograd in 1917 the Bolshevik Party bore little resemblance to the by-and-large united, authoritarian, conspiratorial organization effectively controlled by Lenin depicted in most existing accounts’...; rather, the party was successful precisely because it was flexible and responsive to the moods of the populace, and Rabinowitch 'would emphasize the party's internally relatively democratic, tolerant, and decentralized structure and method of operation, as well as its essentially open and mass character.’”—Slavic Review