Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
The fiftieth anniversary of the Adolf Eichmann trial may have come and gone but in many countries around the world there is a renewed focus on the trial, Eichmann himself, and the nature of his crimes. This increased attention also stimulates scrutiny of Hannah Arendt’s influential and controversial work, Eichmann in Jerusalem.The contributors gathered together by Richard J. Golsan and Sarah M. Misemer in The Trial That Never Ends assess the contested legacy of Hannah Arendt’s famous book and the issues she raised: the "banality of evil", the possibility of justice in the aftermath of monstrous crimes, the right of Israel to kidnap and judge Eichmann, and the agency and role of victims. The contributors also interrogate Arendt’s own ambivalent attitudes towards race and critically interpret the nature of the crimes Eichmann committed in light of newly discovered Nazi documents. The Trial That Never Ends responds to new scholarship by Deborah Lipstadt, Bettina Stangneth, and Shoshana Felman and offers rich new ground for historical, legal, philosophical, and psychological speculation.
Richard J. Golsan is a University Distinguished Professor of French at Texas A&M University. Sarah M. Misemer is an associate professor in the Department of Hispanic Studies at Texas A & M University. She is also the associate director of the Melbern G. Glasscock Center for Humanities Research.
Introduction1 Judging the Past: The Eichmann TrialHenry Rousso2 Eichmann in Jerusalem: Conscience, Normality, and the "Rule of Narrative"Dana Villa3 Banality, AgainDaniel Conway4 Eichmann on the Stand: Self-Recognition and the Problem of TruthValerie Hartouni5. Arendt’s Conservatism and the Eichmann JudgementRussell A. Berman6 Eichmann’s Victims, Holocaust Historiography, and Victim TestimonyCarolyn J. Dean7. Truth and Judgement in Arendt’s WritingLeora Bilsky8. Arendt, German Law and the Crime of AtrocityLawrence Douglas9. Whose Trial? Adolf Eichmann’s or Hannah Arendt’s? The Eichmann Controversy RevisitedSeyla BenhabibContributorsIndex
"This is a collection well worth reading..."- Ned Curthoys, The University of Western Australia (Arendt Studies, vol. 2, 2018) "As a reflection of current trends in a variety of disciplines, this essay collection serves as an apt contribution to a debate that, given the multifaceted nature of Arendt’s oeuvre and the pervasiveness of mass violence, is not likely to end any time soon."- Jürgen Matthäus, Washington, D.C. (American Historical Review, April 2019)