Penelope Maddy is Distinguished Professor of Logic and Philosophy of Science at the University of California, Irvine.

• PrefaceIntroductionI. Kant on LogicII. Naturalizing Kant on LogicIII. The TractatusIV. Naturalizing the TractatusV. Rule-Following and LogicVI. But Isn't Logic Special?!VII. Naturalizing the Logical Must ConclusionReferencesIndex

Most books and articles on Wittgenstein are written by Wittgenstein-philes or Wittgenstein-phobes. By steering clear of those complementary pitfalls, this book provides a remarkably clear and thought-provoking interpretation of Wittgenstein's philosophy of logic. It deserves the attention, not only of Wittgenstein interpreters, but also of anyone with an interest in the philosophy of logic or the history of twientieth century philosophy. ... In its succinct ambitiousness, the book follows in the language of two other exemplary short books on Wittgenstein, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Kripke 1982) and Taking Wittgenstein at his Word (Fogelin 2009). ... It is precisely the strength of these short and focused books that they each, in their own way, hit the nail on the head, and so provide an opportunity for others to 'come and do it better', as Wittgenstein put it in the preface to the Tractatus.

Penelope Maddy is Distinguished Professor of Logic and Philosophy of Science at the University of California, Irvine.

• PrefaceIntroductionI. Kant on LogicII. Naturalizing Kant on LogicIII. The TractatusIV. Naturalizing the TractatusV. Rule-Following and LogicVI. But Isn't Logic Special?!VII. Naturalizing the Logical Must ConclusionReferencesIndex

Most books and articles on Wittgenstein are written by Wittgenstein-philes or Wittgenstein-phobes. By steering clear of those complementary pitfalls, this book provides a remarkably clear and thought-provoking interpretation of Wittgenstein's philosophy of logic. It deserves the attention, not only of Wittgenstein interpreters, but also of anyone with an interest in the philosophy of logic or the history of twientieth century philosophy. ... In its succinct ambitiousness, the book follows in the language of two other exemplary short books on Wittgenstein, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Kripke 1982) and Taking Wittgenstein at his Word (Fogelin 2009). ... It is precisely the strength of these short and focused books that they each, in their own way, hit the nail on the head, and so provide an opportunity for others to 'come and do it better', as Wittgenstein put it in the preface to the Tractatus.

Penelope Maddy is Distinguished Professor of Logic and Philosophy of Science at the University of California, Irvine.

• PrefaceIntroductionI. Kant on LogicII. Naturalizing Kant on LogicIII. The TractatusIV. Naturalizing the TractatusV. Rule-Following and LogicVI. But Isn't Logic Special?!VII. Naturalizing the Logical Must ConclusionReferencesIndex

Most books and articles on Wittgenstein are written by Wittgenstein-philes or Wittgenstein-phobes. By steering clear of those complementary pitfalls, this book provides a remarkably clear and thought-provoking interpretation of Wittgenstein's philosophy of logic. It deserves the attention, not only of Wittgenstein interpreters, but also of anyone with an interest in the philosophy of logic or the history of twientieth century philosophy. ... In its succinct ambitiousness, the book follows in the language of two other exemplary short books on Wittgenstein, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Kripke 1982) and Taking Wittgenstein at his Word (Fogelin 2009). ... It is precisely the strength of these short and focused books that they each, in their own way, hit the nail on the head, and so provide an opportunity for others to 'come and do it better', as Wittgenstein put it in the preface to the Tractatus.