Skickas . Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
Leading Scholars Debate a Key New Testament TopicThe relationship between Matthew, Mark, and Luke is one of the most contested topics in Gospel studies. How do we account for the close similarities--and differences--in the Synoptic Gospels? In the last few decades, the standard answers to the typical questions regarding the Synoptic Problem have come under fire, while new approaches have surfaced. This up-to-date introduction articulates and debates the four major views. Following an overview of the issues, leading proponents of each view set forth their positions and respond to each of the other views. A concluding chapter summarizes the discussion and charts a direction for further study.
Stanley E. Porter (PhD, University of Sheffield) is president, dean, professor of New Testament, and Roy A. Hope Chair in Christian Worldview at McMaster Divinity College in Hamilton, Ontario. He has authored or edited dozens of books. Bryan R. Dyer (PhD, McMaster Divinity College) is acquisitions editor for Baker Academic in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Contents1. The Synoptic Problem: An Introduction to Its Key Terms, Concepts, Figures, and HypothesesStanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer2. The Two Source HypothesisCraig A. Evans3. The Farrer HypothesisMark Goodacre4. The Two Gospel HypothesisDavid Barrett Peabody5. The Orality and Memory HypothesisRainer Riesner6. Two Source Hypothesis ResponseCraig A. Evans7. Farrer Hypothesis ResponseMark Goodacre8. Two Gospel Hypothesis ResponseDavid Barrett Peabody9. Orality and Memory Hypothesis ResponseRainer Riesner10. What Have We Learned regarding the Synoptic Problem, and What Do We Still Need to Learn?Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. DyerIndexes