Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
In Speech-in-Character, Diatribe, and Romans 3:1-9, Justin King argues that the rhetorical skill of speech-in-character (prosopopoiia, sermocinatio, conformatio) offers a methodologically sound foundation for understanding the script of Paul’s imaginary dialogue with an interlocutor in Romans 3:1-9. King focuses on speech-in-character’s stable criterion that attributed speech should be appropriate to the characterization of the speaker. Here, speech-in-character helps to inform which voice in the dialogue speaks which lines, and the general goals of diatribe help shape how an “appropriate” understanding of the script is best interpreted. King’s analyses of speech-in-character, diatribe, and Romans, therefore, make independent contributions while simultaneously working together to advance scholarship on a much debated passage in one of history’s most important texts.
Justin King, Ph.D. (2016), Baylor University, teaches at Baylor University. He has published peer-reviewed articles, including “Rhetorical Chain-Link Construction and the Relationship between Romans 7:1-6 and 7:7-8:39” (JSNT, 2017).
AcknowledgmentsList of Illustrations and Tables1 IntroductionStaging the ProjectMethodologySignificanceAn Outline: A Preview to the ProjectPart 1: Speech-in-CharacterIntroduction to Part 12 Speech-in-Character in the Rhetorical HandbooksPseudo-Cicero: Rhetorica ad HerenniumQuintilian: Institutio OratoriaSummary: Ad Herennium and Quintilian on Speech-in-Character3 Speech-in-Character in the ProgymnasmataTheon: Προγυμνάσματα[Hermogenes]: ΠρογυμνάσματαSummary: Theon and [Hermogenes] on Speech-in-Character4 Speech-in-Character: A SynthesisCore Conventions of Speech-in-Character Unique Features of Speech-in-Character5 Examples of Speech-in-Character in PaulExamples of Speech-in-Character in PaulConclusionPart 2: DiatribeIntroduction to Part 26 Portrayals of DiatribeConclusion7 Examples of Diatribal DialogueIntroductionDialogue and Attributed Speech in Primary Sources for DiatribeConclusionsPart 3: Romans 3:1–9Introduction to Part 38 Traditional Readings of the Dialogue in Rom 3:1–9 and Its Role in the LetterPre-Bultmannian Readings of Romans 3:1–9Diatribal Readings that Affirm the Traditional Script of Romans 3:1–9Preliminary Conclusions9 Rescriptive Readings of the Dialogue in Romans 3:1–9 and Its Role in the LetterNon-Diatribal Critique of Traditional ReadingsRescriptive Readings of the Dialogue of Romans 3:1–9Preliminary Conclusions10 Romans 1–2: The Ethnically Inclusive and Impartial Gospel and the Characterization of the InterlocutorRomans 1:1–12Romans 1:13–15Romans 1:16–17Romans 1:18–32Romans 2Romans 2:1–11Romans 2:12–16Romans 2:17–2911 Romans 3:1–9 and the Argument of RomansRomans 3:1–9Romans 3:1–9 and the Remainder of RomansConclusion12 ConclusionBibliographyIndex