‘King (economic and social history, Univ. of Leicester, UK) makes an impressive contribution to the rehabilitation of the Old Poor Law. Toward the end of his massively researched book, he argues for “the increasing centrality of the sick poor.” Those who administered “a complex amalgam of several poor laws” merit being placed “in a more positive light” than has been common (p. 332). This is a nuanced book, for instance, in describing varying legitimacy of claims for relief of different kinds of poverty and the exercise of agency by the poor. King bases his analysis principally on operational data (correspondence, bills, etc.) from 117 communities located in a selection of diverse counties. This information is supplemented by a second dataset from 146 parishes with less complete records; a third and more miscellaneous dataset is derived from King's from his earlier research (such as coronial court papers) and “notes on patient cases kept by voluntary hospitals and workhouse medical staff”); finally, King lists a fourth dataset (“letters from poor claimants, their advocates and officials," p. 18). A meticulously documented study.’D. M. Fahey, emeritus, Miami University, Choice Reviews, March 2019 Vol. 56 No. 7‘This will prove to be an important book for the study of Old Poor Law policy and practice, wider medical welfare, the professionalisation of medicine, the medical marketplace and the medical economy of makeshifts, and it will contribute to current debates over the relative vibrancy of pauper agency.’Samantha Williams, University of Cambridge, Social History of Medicine, Volume 32, Issue 2, May 2019