Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
Edited and introduced by Robert Arp, Revisiting Aquinas’ Proofs for the Existence of God is a collection of new papers written by scholars focusing on the famous Five Proofs or Ways (Quinque Viae) for the existence of God put forward by St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) near the beginning of his unfinished tome, Summa Theologica. It is not an exaggeration to say that not only is Aquinas’ Summa a landmark text in the history of Western philosophy and Christianity, but also that the Five Proofs discussed therein—namely, the arguments that conclude to the Unmoved Mover, Uncaused Cause, Necessary Being, Superlative Being, and Intelligent Director—are as compelling today as they were in the 13th Century. Written in a debate format with different scholars arguing for and against each Proof, the papers in the book consist of arguments utilizing various combinations of contemporary science and philosophical ideas to bolster the positions. The result is a revisiting of Aquinas’ Proofs that is relevant, stimulating, enlightening, and refreshing.
Robert Arp, PhD (2004), Saint Louis University, is a research analyst working for the US Army. His work in philosophy of religion has appeared in Religious Studies, History of Philosophy Quarterly, International Philosophical Quarterly, Journal of Philosophical Research, and American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. See robertarp.com.
CONTENTSEDITORIAL FOREWORDKENNETH A. BRYSONINTRODUCTIONROBERT ARPTHE FIRST PROOFOne: A Motion to Reconsider: A Defense of Aquinas'Prime Mover Argument for the Existence of GodHEATHER THORNTON MCRAE AND JAMES MCRAETwo: The Prime Mover Removed: A ContemporaryCritique of Aquinas' Prime Mover ArgumentRICHARD GEENEN AND ROGER HUNTThree: A Response to Geenen and HuntHEATHER THORNTON MCRAE AND JAMES MCRAEFour: A Response to McRae and McRaeRICHARD GEENEN AND ROGER HUNTTHE SECOND PROOFFive: The Relevance of Aquinas' Uncaused Cause ArgumentGAVEN KERR, OPSix: The Irrelevance of Aquinas' Uncaused Cause ArgumentHERB ROSEMANSeven: A Response to RosemanGAVEN KERR, OPEight: A Response to KerrHERBERT ROSEMANTHE THIRD PROOFNine: From Contingency to Necessary BeingADAM BARKMANTen: Problems with Aquinas' Third WayEDWARD MOADEleven: A Response to MoadADAM BARKMANTwelve: A Response to BarkmanEDWARD MOADTHE FOURTH PROOFThirteen: A Fourth Way to Prove God's ExistenceDAVID BECKFourteen: Not So Superlative: The Fourth Way as Comparatively ProblematicBENJAMIN W. MCCRAWFifteen: A Response to McCrawEDWARD N. MARTINSixteen: A Response to BeckBENJAMIN W. MCCRAWTHE FIFTH PROOF Seventeen: Aquinas' Fifth Way and the Possibility of ScienceMICHAEL HAYES Eighteen: Science and Nature without GodKEVIN S. DECKERNineteen: A Response to DeckerMICHAEL HAYESTwenty: A Response to HayesKEVIN S. DECKERWORKS CITEDABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORSINDEX