Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability

Vincent L. Hutchings is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Michigan, where he is also Faculty Associate at the Center for Political Studies of the Institute for Social Research. His work has appeared in "American Sociological Review, American Political Science Review, Journal of Politics, Political Communication, Public Opinion Quarterly, Journal of Communication", and "Legislative Studies" Quarterly.

• List of Figures vii List of Tables ix Preface xiii One Issue Importance, Political Context, and Democratic Responsiveness 1 Two Local Press Coverage of Congressional Roll Call Votes 18 Three Context, Motivation, and Selective Attentiveness to the Clarence Thomas Confirmation Vote 35 Four Perceptions of Issue Importance and Campaign Attentiveness 54 Five Priming Issues during Senate Campaigns 75 Six Issue Importance, Campaign Context, and Perceptions of Candidate Distinctiveness in Gubernatorial Elections 95 Seven Issue Importance, Campaign Context, and Political Participation 117 Eight The Role of Public Opinioninthe Democratic Process 131 Notes 143 References 155 Index 165

"This is a well argued and nicely written work that presents the findings in a nontechnical fashion, and it also offers technical appendices for interested readers."--Lawrence J. Grossback, Perspectives on Political Science "[This book] will be widely read, and future research on democratic accountability will need to take both Hutchings' arguments and his empirical evidence into account... [A] first-rate examination of one of the discipline's most fundamental concerns."--Martin Gilens, Perspectives on Politics "[T]he innovative use of attitudinal and contextual data makes this a very useful starting point for future research in the fields of public opinion and electoral behaviour."--Pat Lyons, Political Studies Review "Vincent Hutchings's Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability offers an insightful and clever contribution to our thinking about a persistent paradox... [H]e provides an important supplement to existing scholarship that consists of two seemingly disparate components--and understanding of the general public as uninterested and uninformed about most political issues on the one hand, and research showing that politicians and candidates are remarkably responsive to public sentiment, on the other hand."--Michael Xenos,Public Opinion Quarterly