Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
Despite the end of the Cold War, the frequency of U.S. military intervention has increased. While military intervention accelerated after 9/11, increasing intervention was demonstrably evident well before 2001. Presidential Decision Making and Military Intervention in the Post–Cold War Era: Go or No-Go analyzes presidential decision making regarding military intervention through a focused, structured comparison of “go” and “no-go” decisions from the four successive administrations of Presidents George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama. Dennis Ricci explores competing explanations for why a presidential administration will decide to intervene in one situation and not in another. Since both the situations and decision makers vary across cases, Ricci analyzes explanations for intervention by asking: Why intervene? Why use force or not? Under what conditions or circumstances are intervention decisions made?
Dennis N. Ricci is senior lecturer in politics and history at Curry College.
Chapter 1U.S. Military Intervention in The Post–Cold War EraChapter 2Bush I: Persian Gulf War—GoChapter 3Bush I: Bosnia—No-GoChapter 4Clinton: Rwanda—No-GoChapter 5 Clinton: Kosovo—GoChapter 6 Bush II: Iraq—GoChapter 7 Bush II: Iran—No-GoChapter 8Obama: Libya—GoChapter 9Obama: Syria—No-GoChapter 10Military Intervention & Presidential Decision Making