"This is a well written and very interesting book that, in my view, will have a considerable impact on the field of international relations. The author provides what he promises at the outset—a disciplinary history. The book offers an important caution about how scholars should and should not utilize history and makes a strong case that one's interpretation of international relations theory is a thoroughly political business. It could not be more timely and is precisely the sort of tonic we need as international relations moves into a postpositivist era and as we reopen debate on many of the core concerns with which the book deals. The author tells an interesting story that most of us need to learn. I was genuinely riveted." — Richard W. Mansbach, Iowa State University"This book fills a massive hole in the literature. It also confirms a widely held but largely intuitive suspicion that the early history of international relations theory has been severely distorted. International relations has been one of the most curiously ahistorical of modern academic disciplines, and Schmidt goes a long way toward restoring some historical perspective on contemporary struggles to construct a plausible global politics." — R. B. J. Walker, University of Victoria"The most appealing aspect of The Political Discourse of Anarchy is the author's compelling critique of the discipline's founding myths. To convincingly show that the anarchy/sovereignty problematic was a central question from the 1880s onwards, predating the so-called 'birth' of the discipline by four decades, and to reveal the deep discursive continuities between 'idealism' and 'realism,' represents a massively important contribution. This should be compulsory reading for all final year undergraduates, postgraduates, and members of the international relations profession." — Tim Dunne, University of Wales
