Policing Hot Spots of Crime

David Weisburd is Distinguished Professor of Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University and Executive Director of the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy. He is also the Walter E. Meyer Professor Emeritus of Law and Criminal Justice at the Hebrew University Faculty of Law in Jerusalem. He serves as Chief Science Adviser at the National Policing Institute.

• Part I: The Origins of Hot Spots Policing 1. Small Worlds of Crime and Justice Interventions: Discovering Crime Hot Spots 2. Hot Spots of Crime and Place-Based Prevention Part II: The Law of Crime Concentration 3. The Law of Crime Concentration and Criminology of Place 4. Crime concentrations at micro places: A review of the evidence Part III: Hot Spots of Crime 5. “It’s Not as Bad as People Think the Place Is”: The Potential for Informal Social Control at Crime Hot Spots 6. Hot Spots of Crime Are Not Just Hot Spots of Crime: Examining Health Outcomes at Street Segments 7. The Relationship Between Social Disorganization and Crime at the Micro Geographic Level: Findings from Tel Aviv-Yafo Using Israeli Census Data 8. Does Collective Efficacy Matter at the Micro Geographic Level? Findings From a Study of Street Segments Part IV: Hot Spots Policing 9. General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime “HOT SPOTS”: A Randomized, Controlled Trial 10. Policing Drug Hot Spots: The Jersey City Drug Market Analysis Experiment 11. Does Hot Spots Policing Have Meaningful Impacts on Crime? Findings from an Alternative Approach to Estimating Effect Sizes from Place-Based Program Evaluations 12. Does Crime Just Move Around the Corner? A Controlled Study of Spatial Displacement and Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits 13. Can Hot Spots Policing Reduce Crime In Urban Areas? An Agent-Based Simulation Part V: Hot Spots Policing and Police Reform 14. Does Hot Spots Policing Inevitably Lead to Unfair and Abusive Police Practices, or Can We Maximize Both Fairness and Effectiveness in the New Proactive Policing? 15. Building collective action at crime hot spots: Findings from a randomized field experiment 16. Reforming the police through procedural justice training: A multicity randomized trial at crime hot spots Part VI: Conclusions 17. Hot Spots Policing: What We Know and What We Need to Know

This is an incredibly important collection of scientific works and essays. Weisburd presents a powerful narrative on how practical criminological theories, the willingness of police departments to experiment with new crime preventions ideas, and persistence of a small group of scholars can shift scientific paradigms and policy conversations. The nearly four decades of hot spots policing research and development efforts led by Weisburd and his colleagues obliterated status quo narratives that “police do not prevent crime”, “place-based crime prevention leads to crime displacement”, and “policing harms rather than helps communities.” The world is a safer and fairer place because of the work presented here. This book should be mandatory reading for police executives, mayors and city managers, scholars, and students interested in effective crime prevention policy and practice.Anthony A. Braga, University of PennsylvaniaProfessor Weisburd has curated a wonderful and deeply thoughtful collection of papers for a book that spans both the history and future of crime hotspots and evidence to guide policing best practice. An anthology of this kind could only ever come from Weisburd and his teams of students and colleagues bringing together over nearly four decades of careful research and scholarly insight. With clear historical recollections of how the law of crime concentration emerged and how this “law” must be understood and acted upon by police, Weisburd and Cody Telep’s conclusion charts the way forward for future research, policy and practice considering the “big science” approach for making our streets, communities and cities safer for generations to come. Lorraine Mazerolle AC, The University of Queensland