Addressing Merleau-Ponty’s work Phenomenology of Perception, in dialogue with The Visible and the Invisible, his lectures at the Collège de France, and his reading of Proust, this book argues that at play in his thought is a philosophy of “ontological lateness”. This describes the manner in which philosophical reflection is fated to lag behind its objects; therefore an absolute grasp on being remains beyond its reach. Merleau-Ponty articulates this philosophy against the backdrop of what he calls “cruel thought”, a style of reflecting that seeks resolution by limiting, circumscribing, and arresting its object. By contrast, the philosophy of ontological lateness seeks no such finality—no apocalypsis or unveiling—but is characterized by its ability to accept the veiling of being and its own constitutive lack of punctuality. To this extent, his thinking inaugurates a new relation to the becoming of sense that overcomes cruel thought. Merleau-Ponty’s work gives voice to a wisdom of dispossession that allows for the withdrawal of being. Never before has anyone engaged with the theme of Merleau-Ponty’s own understanding of philosophy in such a sustained way as Whitmoyer does in this volume.
Keith Whitmoyer is Adjunct Assistant Professor at Pace University, the School of Visual Arts, and the New York City College of Technology, USA.
1. IntroductionPart I: Cruel Thought2. First Chapter, Interrogation, Cruel Thought and Inquisition3. Second Chapter, Cruel Thought and the Object4. Third Chapter, Cruel Thought and a Consciousness Without Fissures5. Fourth Chapter, Transcendental Contamination and the Permanent Dissonance of BeingPart II: The Deflagration of Sense6. Fifth Chapter, Le sentir and the Genesis of Sense: Perceptual Synthesis and Temporality7. Sixth Chapter, Temporality disparue8. Seventh Chapter, Freedom and Lateness to BecomingPart III: Philosophy of Weakness, Philosophy of Lateness9. Eighth Chapter, Merleau-Ponty’s Eulogy to Philosophy10. Ninth Chapter, The Lateness of Philosophy11. Tenth Chapter, Fugitive Love: At the Point of Departure12. Conclusion
[Whitmoyer's] reading of Merleau-Ponty is accurate and deep, but what makes it original is its tone ... [His] reading of Merleau-Ponty’s texts ... is reliable and often deep and insightful.