Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
This book approaches the subject of late Roman law from the perspective of legal practice revealed in courtroom processes, as well as more 'informal' types of dispute settlement. From at least the early fourth century, leading bishops, ecclesiastics, and Christian polemicists participated in a vibrant culture of forensic argument, with far-reaching effects on theological debate, the development of ecclesiastical authority, and the elaboration of early 'Canon law'. One of the most innovative aspects of late Roman law was the creation and application of new legal categories used in the prosecution of 'heretics'. Leading Christian polemicists not only used techniques of argument learnt in the late Roman rhetorical schools to help position the Church within the structure of Empire, they also used those techniques in cases involving accusations against 'heretics'- thus defining and developing the concept of Christian orthodoxy itself.
Produktinformation
Utgivningsdatum2007-11-01
Mått145 x 222 x 26 mm
Vikt581 g
FormatInbunden
SpråkEngelska
Antal sidor358
FörlagOUP OXFORD
ISBN9780198208419
UtmärkelserPhilip Leverhulme Prize Winner 2008Awarded ^IIl Premio della Corte Costituzionale della Reppublica italiana^R by the 'Gérard Boulvert Society for the Study of European Civilization and for the History of its Legal Systems'
Introduction ; Part I Forensic practitioners and the development of late Roman law ; 1. Introduction and background ; 2. Litigation and late Roman judges ; 3. Legal experts and the late Roman courts ; 4. Late Roman advocates ; PART II FORENSIC PRACTITIONERS IN THE SERVICE OF THE LATE ANTIQUE CHURCH ; 5. Introduction and background ; 6. Ecclesiastics as forensic practitioners ; 7. Forensic expertise and the development of early Canon law ; PART III ORTHODOXY, HERESY AND THE COURTS. ; 8. Defining heresy and orthodoxy ; 9. Heresy and the courts ; 10. Conclusion
H.'s discussion of the way the categories of heresiological thinking were reinforced and even created through legal modes of expression and practice is fascinating... Orthodoxy and the Courts makes its most significant contribution, however, in the way it rethinks the relationship between secular law and cannon law.