U.S. policymakers must come to terms with the implications of the "globalization of technology"--specifically, the dramatic increase in crossborder technical activities of private corporations and the rapid growth and redistribution of global technical capabilities since the mid-1970s. This book presents a policy framework for reconciling our national interests with the realities of the emerging global technical enterprise. Specific recommendations address how public policies can help ensure that U.S. citizens derive a fair share of the benefits of the global technology base. The volume discusses corporate nationality and its relevance to the policy debate, the need for greater international policy cooperation and negotiation in antitrust law, and the obligations of multinational corporations and their home and host governments. It also includes a series of detailed, up-to-date "technology profiles" of eight global industries, from aircraft engines to semiconductors.
Thomas H. Lee and Proctor P. Reid, Editors; Committee on Engineering as an International Enterprise, National Academy of Engineering
1 FRONT MATTER; 2 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS; 3 1. THE EMERGING GLOBAL TECHNICAL ENTERPRISE; 4 2. OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF GLOBALIZATION; 5 3. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE U.S. TECHNICAL ENTERPRISE; 6 4. CAPTURING BENEFITS OF GLOBAL TECHNICAL ADVANCE: POLICY IMPLICATIONS; 7 APPENDIXES; 8 A. INDUSTRY TECHNOLOGY PROFILES; 9 B. CONTRIBUTORS; 10 C. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION ON COMMITTEE MEMBERS; 11 INDEX
National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, Policy and Global Affairs, Institute of Medicine, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Ocean Studies Board, National Academy of Engineering, Committee on Environmental Information for Naval Use
National Research Council, National Academy of Engineering, Policy and Global Affairs, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Committee on Engineering Education, Committee on Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers, John Sislin, Mary C. Mattis
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Engineering, Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering