This study of post-independence Juba, its depressed and challenged economy in post-war South Sudan, describes how people survive and how microcredit institutions can learn from this case. It argues that South Sudan is not the Grameen Bank’s Bangladesh and that there is no “cookie cutter” model for success in microcredit loans. It critiques neoliberal economics and is valuable for practitioners, addressing the controversy between lending to the ultra-poor or to marginally prosperous. In a social context where social ties are valued over borrower repayment and are weakened by hyperinflation and import dependence, the author concludes that microfinance is in need of accommodation to specific contexts. It argues that microfinance institutions are beholden to debt ratings, problematic metrics and external constraints from non-local lenders and calls for revisiting microfinance in post-conflict environments.