Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
Through a methodologically-minded reconstruction of the Marxian critique of political economy, this study shows that the outcome of the historical movement of the objectified form of social mediation, which has turned into the very alienated subject of social life (i.e. capital), is to develop, as its own immanent determination, the constitution of the (self-abolishing) working class as a revolutionary subject.
Guido Starosta is Professor of the History of Economic Thought at the National University of Quilmes, Argentina and Adjunct Investigator at the Council for Scientific and Technical Research. He has published many articles on value-theory, method and subjectivity in the Marxian critique of political economy.
AcknowledgementsIntroduction: On the Current State of Revolutionary TheoryPart I. Marx’s Early Critique of Political Economy: The Discovery of the Revolutionary Subject and the Development of Science as Practical Criticism1. The Dialectic of Alienated Labour and the Determinations of Revolutionary Subjectivity in the Paris Manuscripts2. The Overcoming of Philosophy and the Development of a Materialist Science3. Marx on Proudhon: The Critique of Dialectical Logic and the Political Determination of Science as Practical CriticismPart II. Dialectical Knowledge in Motion: Revolutionary Subjectivity in Marx’s Mature Critique of Political Economy4. The Commodity Form and the Dialectical Method5. The Role and Place of Commodity Fetishism in Marx’s Dialectical Exposition in Capital6. The Commodity Form, Subjectivity and the Practical Nature of Defetishising Critique7. Capital Accumulation and Class Struggle: On the Content and Form of Social Reproduction in Its Alienated Form8. Real Subsumption and the Genesis of the Revolutionary Subject9. By Way of a Conclusion: Further Explorations into the Determinations of Revolutionary SubjectivityBibliographyIndex