A significant and strikingly original contribution to our understanding of literature and society in the American Renaissance.... Leverenz views the masterpieces of this era as symptoms of a pervasive cultural malaise in antebellum America, tracing the faults and fractures produced in them by the combined pressures of class consciousness, marketplace economics, and gender ideologies. His close readings of representative texts from the late 1830s through the early 1850s consequently open out to reveal a social reality much darker—and far more distressing to writers struggling to cope with the problems it entailed—than that encountered in virtually any other literary study of the American Renaissance.(Nineteenth-Century Literature) A thoughtful analysis of our great American writers of the mid-nineteenth century.... A challenging work that is like a fresh breeze in our current criticism.(Thoreau Society Bulletin) David Leverenz discovers deeply troubled meditations on masculinity and class through rich and subtle readings on the literary pantheon of the American Renaissance.... His close readings of Hawthorne, Emerson, Thoreau, Melville, and Whitman, among others, show how class and gender became deeply entwined.(The Nation) Irreverent, gutsy, brilliant, and illuminating.(Publishers Weekly) Leverenz makes a persuasive case for understanding the relation between class and gender as a key to making sense of the major works of mid-nineteenth-century American literature.... He sees the literature of the American Renaissance as wracked by tensions of gender and class traceable principally to the rise of entrepreneurial capitalism.... Under his critical eye, one is able to see how masculinity functions in 'classic' texts as contested terrain, not only in opposition to the construction of women's identity, but as part of class identity as well. Moreover, Leverenz's rhetorical construction of himself in the text plays an important part of the persuasiveness of his argument. It is a construction which self-consciously points to the incorporation of bourgeois ideals of manhood in academic prose and acts to undermine them.(American Quarterly)