This book makes a new and original contribution to the old debate about differences between socio-economic and civil and political rights, which has engaged human rights discourse over several decades.Although scholars and practitioners now agree that these categories are more alike than originally assumed, they continue to delineate them based on the alleged difference between immediate and progressive realisation. The book asks whether this differentiation is still valid by exploring the historical and theoretical background, the text of relevant UN human rights treaties, and the practice of the UN human rights committees. By so doing, it shows that the standards of realisation converge more than diverge and that this last remaining distinction should be abandoned.Human rights lawyers, advocates, practitioners and policy makers will find this book invaluable as it brings much needed clarification to this key question.
Tobias Wirthle is Researcher at Münster University, Germany.
IntroductionPart 1: History and Theory1. The Rise and Fall of the Historic Divide between Socio-economic and Civil and Political Rights2. The Concept of Progressive RealisationPart 2: Analysis of Committee Jurisprudence3. The General Conception of the Divide between Categories4. Civil and Political Rights as Progressively Realisable5. Civil and Political Rights as Subject to Resource Availability6. The Application of the Margin of Appreciation and the Reasonableness Standard to Civil and Political RightsPart 3: Treaty Interpretation7. The Applicable Rules of Treaty Interpretation, Ordinary Meaning, and Context8. External Sources of Treaty Interpretation9. Supplementary Means and Result of InterpretationConclusion, Recommendations, and Outlook