'[This] book is a delight - entertaining, original, fresh, creative, genuinely amusing, and not merely innovative, but surprisingly incisive and insightful...This brief summary, like the brief dish description on the menu of an excellent restaurant, cannot do justice to the richness, nuance and sophistication of the book as a whole. It masterfully carries off the difficult task of simultaneously entertaining and enlightening.' The Journal of Politics 'Top, bottom, homosexuality, illegitimacy and more. Here all the stimulating issues surrounding queer theory enliven the traditional debates over authority for constitutional interpretation. This book is Susan Burgess at her path-breaking best. Like her earlier work and her professional contributions, The Founding Fathers, Pop Culture, and Constitutional Law is both fun and very important.' John Brigham, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA 'For nearly a decade, Susan Burgess has been producing some of the most provocative scholarship at the intersection of cultural studies, law, and politics. This book draws together and significantly extends her previous work. Interesting, insightful, and laugh-out-loud funny, The Founding Fathers, Pop Culture, and Constitutional Law: Who's Your Daddy? will change the way people think about old questions of legal power and judicial legitimacy.' Keith J. Bybee, Syracuse University, USA 'Engaging, witty, provocative, and, strongly persuasive, Burgess's argument marks out new territory for scholars of constitutional interpretation...[it is] required reading for all who study, celebrate, or critique the elemental sway that the Constitution and its authors exert over the American imagination.' CHOICE '...an immensely interesting and thought-provoking book that should be read by graduate students and scholars of constitutional law...' Law and Politics Book Review '...a must-read for those wishing to advance the cause of liberty free of the fetters of long-dead founding fathers, and for scholars in search of an original style of presentation to frame the argument.' Law Society Journal