Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar. Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249 kr.
This is an extensive survey and critical examination of the literature on the use of expert opinion in scientific inquiry and policy making.Cooke considers how expert opinion is being used today, how an expert's uncertainty is or should be represented, how people do or should reason with uncertainty, how the quality and usefulness of expert opinion can be assessed, and how the views of several experts might be combined. He argues for the importance of developing practical models with a transparent mathematical foundation for the use of expert opinion in science, and presents three tested models. Detailed case studies illustrate how they can be applied to a diversity of real problems in engineering and planning.
`so clearly and meticulously presented ... a book that is so clear and honest about the limmitations of its approach, is to be warmly welcomed as a contribution to a discussion which is by no means ended.'New Scientist
Dorota Kurowicka, Roger M. Cooke, The Netherlands) Kurowicka, Dorota (Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands) Cooke, Roger M. (Delft University of Technology
Kristin Shrader-Frechette, University of Notre Dame) Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (O'Neill Family Professor, O'Neill Family Professor, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Philosophy
Kristin Shrader-Frechette, University of Notre Dame) Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (O'Neill Family Professor, O'Neill Family Professor, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Philosophy
Kristin Shrader-Frechette, University of Notre Dame) Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (O'Neill Family Professor, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Philosophy, O'Neill Family Professor, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Philosophy