It is anticipated that in the coming decade the Department of Defense (DoD) will field and test new advertising and recruiting initiatives designed to improve the recruiting outlook. The DoD needs a comprehensive research and evaluation strategy based on sound research principles that will ensure valid, reliable, and relevant results to discover the most promising policies. The primary objective of this book is to help the DoD improve its research on advertising and recruiting policies. Evaluating Military Advertising and Recruiting: Theory and Methodology presents a framework for evaluation that links different types of research questions to various research methodologies. The framework identifies four major categories of research questions and four broad methodological approaches. The first category of research question asks a /What does a target audience see as attractive or unattractive features of a program?a It is well suited to examination via qualitative methods, such as focus groups, unstructured or open-ended surveys, and interviews. The second category of research question asks a /What is the effect of a program on specified attitudes or behavioral intentions?aIt is well suited to examination via surveys, experiments, and quasi experiments. The third category of research question asks a /What is the effect of a proposed new program on enlistment?a It is well suited to examination via experiments and quasi experiments. The final category of research question asks a /What is the effect of an existing program on enlistment?a It is well suited to examination via econometric modeling.
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Medicine, and Families Board on Children, Youth, Steve Olson
National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Commission on Life Sciences, Board on Toxicology and Environmental Health Hazards, Safe Drinking Water Committee
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Statistical Sciences Committee on AIDS Research and the Behavioral, Social, Lincoln E. Moses, Heather G. Miller, Charles F. Turner
National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, and Applications Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Committee to Provide Interim Oversight of the DOE Nuclear Weapons Complex
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Human-Systems Integration, Panel on Human Factors in Air Traffic Control Automation, James P. McGee, Raja Parasuraman, Anne S. Mavor, Christopher D. Wickens
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Human-Systems Integration, Panel on Human Factors in Air Traffic Control Automation, James P. McGee, Anne S. Mavor, Christopher D. Wickens
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Human Factors, Committee on Human-System Design Support for Changing Technology, Anne S. Mavor, Richard W. Pew
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Performance Appraisal for Merit Pay, Anne S. Mavor, Renae F. Broderick, Alexandra K. Wigdor, George T. Milkovich
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Military Enlistment Standards, Anne S. Mavor, Bert F. Green